On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:26 -0700, Entrope wrote:
> Send inter-server PINGs and PONGs with high priority.
Um...one side effect of this will be to reduce the utility of the AsLL
results. Now we'll know the asymmetric link latency for the high
priority band, but the low priority band may be backed
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 07:24 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> > hmmm...how about a version of "directop" for any connected operator,
> > whether direct or not? How about a test for a local oper in a specific
> > class, i.e., an admin?
>
> Those make sense, as do variables.
:)
> > (That makes me won
Kevin L. Mitchell writes:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 00:07 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> > Good idea? Bad idea? Good idea but bad code? Would other crule
> > functions be useful? Should I be spending more time on other feature
> > requests?
>
> Seems like a good idea to me. Haven't spent a lot
