On 10 Dec 2007, at 17:49, Tom Rons wrote:
> Now it reports 2048 for currrent and max and guess what, ircd runs...
> How peculiar that you first have to raise the FD limit manually to fix
> the max limit, at least to me it seems. :)
OK, last run. I have tried everything again from scratch with the
On 10 Dec 2007, at 15:04, Tom Rons wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2007, at 06:03, Michael Poole wrote:
>> One early step would be to change line 185 in s_bsd.c (the "error
>> setting max fd's" line) to something like this:
>> fprintf(stderr, "error setting max fds to %d: %s\n", limit,
>> strerror(errno));
>> T
On 10 Dec 2007, at 06:03, Michael Poole wrote:
> One early step would be to change line 185 in s_bsd.c (the "error
> setting max fd's" line) to something like this:
> fprintf(stderr, "error setting max fds to %d: %s\n", limit,
> strerror(errno));
> That would at least give the error message, alt
Richard writes:
> Actually they can set up a sandbox, since the under-pinnings of OS X
> is Darwin, which is freely available for download, and is all that is
> needed for ircu.
The only thing I could find after almost an hour of searching was a
list of 300 downloadable packages of source code, w
Actually they can set up a sandbox, since the under-pinnings of OS X
is Darwin, which is freely available for download, and is all that is
needed for ircu.
On 12/10/07, Holland Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some time ago I submitted a patch to compile ircu on OS X (which I
> believe it or so
