first warning, it appears that the file is quite old, and needs to be
updated anyway. Can you please privately email me the file and I will
look at it?
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not sure if this is the right place to send this, as it isnt officially
gnuworld, but would be appreciated if anyon
A patch has been submitted to accomodate these purposes. It is being reviewed
at present. If it proves to be a safe enough alternative, it will be comitted
to the gnuworld source tree.
Dan
clueless person wrote:
> hello again. sorry to bother you.
> Has anything ever been coded for gn
Submitting patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and presumable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as well) is fine. Whether or not the code makes it into the
gnuworld cvs tree is up to the owner of the particular module (Gte for cservice,
MrBean for ccontrol, etc).
Thanks, and keep the patches coming :)
Dan
Andrew
Looks like that module isn't being compiled. Make sure to add it to the
Makefile.am, and rerun automake/autoconf.
Tim Ireland wrote:
> i now this isnt a 'default' part of the services, but i was wondering if
> anyone has managed to get it to work with GNUWorld.
> the version of gnuworld i am ru
Can you please send the stack trace from gdb? Also, it is unethical to send
burst information which includes information about ppl's IP's.
Thanks,
Dan
Inge Hagen wrote:
> Hi there is still some problems whit the mod.cloner module..
> Module did start but whene i try to msg
This problem has been corrected.
Inge Hagen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Someone know how to fix this error, i have try to reinstall mod.cloner
> manny times but I always get this error.
> I have deleted mod.cloner and downladed a new code for your cvs
> database.
>
> Making all in mod.cloner
> gmake[1]: En
Where on your system is getopt.h located?
The legend of the darkness wrote:
> When i was trying to compile GNUWorld
> getopts.h was not found, required by main.cc
>
> The system is FreeBSD 4.6-Release with gcc 2.95.3
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Andreas Louca
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Why not? As I understand it, the max users field is useless anyway.
Dan
bas wrote:
> why does gnuworld (still) send its "max users" numeric be "ABl"
> (obviously NOT a 2^n-1)
Ewps, forgot an #include. Problem fix0red.
Dan
Inge Hagen wrote:
> Someone know how I can fix this error?
> I'm running Rad hat 7.2 whit
> GNU Make version 3.79.1
> automake (GNU automake) 1.6.1
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.53
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-
There was a problem with one of the checkin's yesterday, this has been
corrected.
Dan
Alexander Maassen wrote:
> This means that during cvs update there where some issues with certain files
> getting updated, since you probably did not watch what happened during the
> cvs u
u actually do read or write *until an EWOULDBLOCK*, no problem.
If your code has a path where it fails to do so, it will get stuck,
as no further readiness events will be forthcoming. That's all.
- Dan
Aaron Sethman wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> > Kev wrote:
> > >
> > > > The /dev/epoll patch is good, but the interface is different enough
> > > > from /dev/poll that ircd would need a new engine_epoll.c anyway.
> > &g
ointed.
> The thing we do not currently do is, attempt to read or write
> unless we've received notification first. This is what I am assuming is
> breaking it.
Yeah, that would break it, too, I think.
- Dan
DBLOCK from them.
If this didn't make any sense, maybe seeing how it's used might help.
Look at Poller::clearReadiness() in
http://www.kegel.com/dkftpbench/doc/Poller.html#DOC.9.11 or
http://www.kegel.com/dkftpbench/dkftpbench-0.38/Poller_sigio.cc
and the calls to Poller::clearReadiness() in
http://www.kegel.com/dkftpbench/dkftpbench-0.38/ftp_client_pipe.cc
- Dan
otification.)
And then there's /dev/yapoll (http://www.distributopia.com), which
I haven't tried yet (I don't think the author ever published the patch?).
Anyway, the new engine wouldn't be too hard to write, and
would let irc run fast without a patched kernel.
- Dan
er.com
I'm not after realistic, neccessarily, though.
- Dan
http://www.kegel.com
ients, just to verify that
poll() was indeed a bottleneck (ok, can't imagine it not being a
bottleneck, but it's nice to have a baseline to compare the improved
version against).
- Dan
17 matches
Mail list logo