Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Valcor
had suggested something like SpamAssassin to user-com@, but that was shot down too. It's a very effective solution, and can even work with RBLs such as ordb.org. -- Valcor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [Webmasters] Re: [Coder-Com] Web based channel lookup

2002-12-23 Thread Valcor
ome new code to try updating that at the moment. When I have it done, that page will be real time to about 30mins I guess. I wouldn't want to update it too quickly otherwise we could end up flooding something ;) -- Valcor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [Coder-Com] UNDERNET/WEBCHAT

2002-10-07 Thread Valcor
ontact about this, you'd more likely want the webmasters team. But as I do a little work with them, I can just give you the link www.javirc.com All the details about the java irc client we have on the undernet website can be found on that address. -- Valcor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Valcor
igher roles that keep being added to other channels without being consulted ;) > In short, the best thing to do is set up a timer to /msg X info > yourusername How would forcing X to requery your username every X mins/secs be less taxing than getting X to look once when you log in? I might have missed something there ;) -- Valcor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [Coder-Com] level 500 command proposal

2002-05-18 Thread Valcor
a majority of the domains quickly. (Anything containing c, n, o like net, com, org, co). That ban will also match a lot more than just the ends. I'm still not sure if that'd still b e a suitable solution. -- Valcor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [Coder-Com] bug with the unban cmd

2002-05-01 Thread Valcor
e first two aren't there... I am more than likely wrong... Did you try a banlist after you set the *!*@*? Were they listed then in X's banlist? As I said... excuse the feeble mind, and probably poor understanding of the way things are currently running ;) -- Valcor (No need to CC: me... I'm on the list)

Re: [Coder-Com] username in /whois?? please remove!

2002-04-19 Thread Valcor
As far as I remember, setting invisible in X doesn't stop the /msg x verify command from working... it still displays the info... it just stops /msg x info from returning useful data such as who you're logged in from. -- Valcor On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Evans wrote: > You can

Re: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint

2002-04-18 Thread Valcor
even if user changes his IP (with isp > reconnection) he is still glined because his fingerprint is glined. Other > users from aol can join. You mean maybe like their processor serial/mac address/OS id? -- Valcor

Re: [Coder-Com] /whois nick nick issue?

2002-04-16 Thread Valcor
Guess I should read a bit more on that CFV... that is a really annoying addition, especially when trying to deal with idlers in a channel, we cannot tell if the person is just quiet in the channel, or idle. Oh well :P Thanks for the info - Valcor -Original Message- From: Lee H

[Coder-Com] /whois nick nick issue?

2002-04-16 Thread Valcor
Okay... number two... noticed that some servers are not responding with the idle times when doing a /whois nick nick request. Again I'm on amsterdam.nl.eu.undernet.org so I don't know if that has anything to do with it. Is it just me again? - Valcor

Re: [Coder-Com] new /whois line backwards?

2002-04-12 Thread Valcor
Hi Kev, That cleared it up... thanks... you'll have to excuse my knowledge... I'm just starting to understand the code a little better, although not a coder myself (at least not this language)... I'm starting to pick more things up. - Valcor -Original Message- Fr

[Coder-Com] new /whois line backwards?

2002-04-12 Thread Valcor
Hi, Just been looking on amsterdam.nl.eu.undernet.org, and noticed the new ACCOUNT reply in the /whois, but it seems to be backwards. For example: ••• Valcor is ~[EMAIL PROTECTED] ••• Valcor is «Jonathan Angliss» ••• Valcor on Amsterdam.NL.EU.undernet.org ••• Valcor Valcor is logged in

Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Valcor
it had just removed the ban from the channel. At least that's the behaviour I am understanding anyway. :) - Valcor -Original Message- From: Empus [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Coder-Com] F

Re: [Coder-Com] Ideas

2002-04-02 Thread Valcor
cservice members... and then you also have to consider the issue that some people work in both areas. User-com doesn't have any username registration systems... so that'd maybe have to be made just to fit this idea. I think the current idea of *@.users.undernet.org is fine. -- Valcor

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-10 Thread Valcor
Hi Hidden, Erm... my understanding of it would be the last ban over rules the other three bans, so the ircd drops the unnecessary bans. That is why you only see the final ban. I could stand corrected though ;) - Valcor -Original Message- From: Hidden [mailto: [EMAIL

Re: [Coder-Com] .11 feature/bug ?

2001-12-03 Thread Valcor
ld be corrected. - Valcor -Original Message- From: Pascal Gloor [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Coder-Com] .11 feature/bug ? -- > Hi Kevin, > I m running .11 on a testnet, an

Re[2]: [Coder-Com]

2001-09-16 Thread Valcor
27;ve done some work with windows based IRCds recently. --- Valcor +-+ | Those who make peaceful revolution | | impossible will make violent revolution | | inevitable | +-+ -Original

Re: [Coder-Com] idea for the servers

2001-08-28 Thread Valcor
I think I proposed this idea in user-com@ and sent my updated list to magic, although it's not appeared yet. Not even sure if he got it as I was having mail issues at the time. --- Valcor +-+ | To learn the true meaning of victory, | | go and as

Re: [Coder-Com] some recent change

2001-08-15 Thread Valcor
to make it for ircops/admin only. --- Valcor +-+ | Know confidently that the accumulation | | of experience tempered by awareness | | will eventually banish any of the | | confusion that plays servant to | | smal