On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
> Each OS has his own fingerprint. By example, when sending a SYN|ACK|FIN|RST
> on a closed port, and user answers with RST, It's a Windows OS (because it
> doesn't follow the RFC).
That's OS finger printing, which will only tell you which OS
they're u
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
> >>
> >>> what about ban/kil
> > You mean maybe like their processor serial/mac address/OS id?
> >
>
> Each OS has his own fingerprint. By example, when sending a SYN|ACK|FIN|RST
> on a closed port, and user answers with RST, It's a Windows OS (because it
> doesn't follow the RFC).
That only tells you what type of OS it is
- Original Message -
From: "Valcor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
>
> > > What exactly do you mean by
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:32:46PM +0100, Chris Crowther wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
>
> > I mean fingerprint is a sort a computer id and if I gline a users with
> > *@*.aol.com with his fingeprint, even if user changes his IP (with isp
> > reconnection) he is still glined because
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Alocin wrote:
> I'm curious... Theoricaly.. would there be a way to retreive the mac
> address?
The MAC address of the sending host is only available on the same
LAN (or VLAN) as the sending host. Plus dialup nodes don't have MAC
addresses - not real ones anyway, th
> I'm curious... Theoricaly.. would there be a way to retreive the mac
> address?
Only if you're on the same network as the other end of the connection.
--
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OK, I see what you're talking about now, but how would you go
> about generating a fingerprint? Baring in mind that we have no access to
> their local system to use details such as CPU ID...and we likely never
> will have either (I'm not sure I'd want that information from the users).
>
>
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Basically that means that all users have to register somehow somewhere
> and practically it means that a working e-mail adress is thrown into
> the equation for authentication.
Well we have that with the channel service, with the +r mode we
could
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
> I mean fingerprint is a sort a computer id and if I gline a users with
> *@*.aol.com with his fingeprint, even if user changes his IP (with isp
> reconnection) he is still glined because his fingerprint is glined. Other
> users from aol can join.
OK,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:41:20PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Perhaps he means something like my EAID.
Err, AID... The EAID (Encoded Authentication ID) is only given
out to grant priviledges to people. But the AID can be used
for banning without actually _getting_ the AID (which would
be bad bec
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
> > What exactly do you mean by fingerprint? You can set klines and
> > bans on masks such as *@*.aol.com already.
> >
>
> I mean fingerprint is a sort a computer id and if I gline a users with
> *@*.aol.com with his fingeprint, even if user changes his IP (wit
on 18/4/02 06:15, Chojin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Chojin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:02 PM
> Subjec
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chojin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Choj
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chojin wrote:
> what about ban/kill using fingerprint associated with a provider ? (I want
> to ban someone with *.aol.com associated with his fingerprint).
What exactly do you mean by fingerprint? You can set klines and
bans on masks such as *@*.aol.com already.
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
