Re: [Coder-Com] Feature looking for a coder

2002-06-04 Thread Kev
> Here's a preliminary hack against .11, doesn't even have a ChangeLog. > Reporting via /stats v. It works ok with a non-AsLL 2.10.11 server, and > presumably with a .10 too. I'm curious if this is what you had in mind. > Also note that, at least for now, the upstream/downstream lag calculations >

Re: [Coder-Com] Feature looking for a coder

2002-06-04 Thread Alex Badea
Here's a preliminary hack against .11, doesn't even have a ChangeLog. Reporting via /stats v. It works ok with a non-AsLL 2.10.11 server, and presumably with a .10 too. I'm curious if this is what you had in mind. Also note that, at least for now, the upstream/downstream lag calculations rely on t

[Coder-Com] Feature looking for a coder

2002-06-03 Thread Kev
Some time ago, I put forward a proposal to this list for a way to measure lag and types of lag. I called this "AsLL," or "Asymmetric Link Latency." The idea is that you add an accurate timestamp to PING in the server->server exchange. When an AsLL-enabled server receives this PING, it'll return