> > Quite true. The whole configuration file parsing code sucks rocks; I'm
> > hoping we'll be able to do a full roto-till for the next major release
> > (u2.10.12).
>
> Am I allowed to mutter things about hybrids conf file parser now?
> *g*
Heck, you're allowed to throw it in if you have
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Kev wrote:
> Quite true. The whole configuration file parsing code sucks rocks; I'm
> hoping we'll be able to do a full roto-till for the next major release
> (u2.10.12).
Am I allowed to mutter things about hybrids conf file parser now?
*g*
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crow
> > You're missing another ":" it should be
> > H:*.*::H36.PreProd.PartyNet.Org
> >
> Ys but it'd be neater if the error happens without crash...
Quite true. The whole configuration file parsing code sucks rocks; I'm
hoping we'll be able to do a full roto-till for the next major release
(u2.10.1
> You're missing another ":" it should be
> H:*.*::H36.PreProd.PartyNet.Org
>
Ys but it'd be neater if the error happens without crash...
You're missing another ":" it should be
H:*.*::H36.PreProd.PartyNet.Org
-Dawg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Mathieu Rene
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Coder-Com] H: line causing
The following line caused the following error in a 2.10.11 environement:
H:*.*:H36.PreProd.PartyNet.Org
using ircd -t I can see this:
ircd: s_conf.c:488: attach_confs_byname: Assertion `0 != tmp->name' failed.
Aborted
Math
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
