On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 13:26, Jessy Côté wrote:
> What's happen with "muh" and the new version of ircu (.06)? We can't rejoin
> channel when we reconnected to "muh". Something wrong?
Though I have no idea what "muh" is, I would suggest that it does not
properly implement RFC 1459. You should re
Okay, thanks.
At 15:08 04-01-18, you wrote:
Jessy Côté wrote:
What's happen with "muh" and the new version of ircu (.06)? We can't
rejoin channel when we reconnected to "muh". Something wrong?
At a guess, muh's parsing of JOIN messages from the server is broken, talk
to the muh author about the
Jessy Côté wrote:
What's happen with "muh" and the new version of ircu (.06)? We can't
rejoin channel when we reconnected to "muh". Something wrong?
At a guess, muh's parsing of JOIN messages from the server is broken,
talk to the muh author about their broken use of requiring a ":" before
a JO
What's happen with "muh" and the new version of ircu (.06)? We can't rejoin
channel when we reconnected to "muh". Something wrong?
Regards,
LeRebel
--
Ce message Envoi est certifie sans virus connu.
Analyse effectuee par Anti-virus AVG (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.211 / Base de donnees