> We use RPL 302 in hybrid, and have for some time. Perhaps it
We seem to want to use a different numeric for /USERIP than for
/USERHOST. I can't really say whether this is a good or bad
idea *shrug*
> would be better for ircu to do the same for the sake of
> client developers?
> We use the for
No, this will only show that you have authenticated your login with X.
-- notnet
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Braden Temme wrote:
> So ummm... are we supporting registered nicks on Undernet now? O.o Please say no
>:cP
>
> Regards,
> Braden
>
> --- Kev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just committed
So ummm... are we supporting registered nicks on Undernet now? O.o Please say no :cP
Regards,
Braden
--- Kev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just committed ircu2.10.11.beta.15. One of the changes that everyone
> must be aware of is that the reply for /USERIP is now 340, not 307. This
> was ne
I just committed ircu2.10.11.beta.15. One of the changes that everyone
must be aware of is that the reply for /USERIP is now 340, not 307. This
was necessary to resolve a conflict between the meaning of the numeric in
Undernet ircu and other irc server versions.
Another change is the addition o
