;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:52 AM
>Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages
>
>
>Disagree. Why hamper what are often not a problem?
>
>When we start censoring quit messages we have to continue to censor
>everything
just filter it out , to a maxlenght in quit msg say to 15 for personal
preferences as an example
Larry
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bjørn Osdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02
Plus it's of course a solvable-with-client-script problem
BoD
- Original Message -
From: Mark Foster
To: Bjørn Osdal ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages
Disagree. Why hamper what are often not a problem?
When we
Disagree. Why hamper what are often not a problem?
When we start censoring quit messages we have to continue to censor
everything Sheesh, I can think of bigger deals than the length
of quit messages...
Mark/BlakJak
At 17:52 1/10/01 +0200, Bjørn Osdal wrote:
I presume I`m not the
only one on u
I presume I`m not the only one on undernet who thinks it is
annoying that for example: a user join a channel, doesnt say anything for two
hours, and then quit like this, with two whole lines.
Nick has quit IRC: (Bye folx! I will REALLY MISS YA!!
that goes for nick1 nick2 nick3 nick4
