* daaave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-07 00:00:50 -0600]:
> That, and uus@ is the project list, so if you have questions we
> recommend that you email the main [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
Sorry to take this off-topic, but I thought it was necessary to post
this to the same forum. Since I posted
* stoney` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-06 18:06:58 -0500]:
> User-com is in the process of creating multi platform user scrips for use
> on Undernet. For more information. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> stoney`
While this is technically true, the script is in such a major
pre-alpha right now that I
User-com is in the process of creating multi platform user scrips for use
on Undernet. For more information. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stoney`
At 08:09 AM 12/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
on other networks...
What if we created so
> That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
> on other networks...
>
> What if we created some in-channel op commands for "X" like...
> !kb (Kickban)
> !b (Ban)
> !k (Kick)
> !op (Set Op)
> !dop (Unset Op)
> !v (Voice)
> !dv (De-Voice)
> !ld (LockDown: Kicks everyone
That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
on other networks...
What if we created some in-channel op commands for "X" like...
!kb (Kickban)
!b (Ban)
!k (Kick)
!op (Set Op)
!dop (Unset Op)
!v (Voice)
!dv (De-Voice)
!ld (LockDown: Kicks everyone that has no access abov
