On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> something like that is being made, as "op levels" - they are all ops,
> with a @, but lower level ops can't de-op higher level ops. basically,
> it is to prevent this: a ops b, b de-ops a.
iirc that only works with the lightweight channel re
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Half-Op
> > Hi, I would like to know if you have ever planified to had half-op
> > support to Undernet ircd, i'm sure this can be a great thing,
> > specialy with x. And made it avaible to people
> Hi, I would like to know if you have ever planified to had half-op
> support to Undernet ircd, i'm sure this can be a great thing,
> specialy with x. And made it avaible to people with an access >
> than 75. With the half-op status user with access 75 & + can do the
> samething that they already
Hi, I would like to know if you have ever planified to had half-op support
to Undernet ircd, i'm sure this can be a great thing, specialy with x. And
made it avaible to people with an access > than 75. With the half-op status
user with access 75 & + can do the samething that they already can do wi
We're in the process of coding "op-levels".
This means that when person A gives ops to B, then person
B can not deop or kick person A. Also, when person A
ops persons B and C, then B and C cannot kick or deop
eachother.
Perhaps this satisfies that you want?
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 04:57:49PM -0
Hi, I would like to know if you have planned to support half-op on
undernet. I think this is a great and usefull feature, and you can
easily mixt it with access on X like 75 to 99 half op and 100+ op, or
something like this.
KeKuN
