> > Since u2.10.11.03. Because these channel names have been abused in an
> > attempt to make the abuser appear to be an official. This will not be
> > changed. No, the RFC says nothing about these characters in a channel
> > name being illegal.
>
> I thought colors were a client thing and not
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:20:43PM -0500, Kev wrote:
>
> > When trying to join channels with ascii character 3 in the name, I now get a
> > 'cahannel does not exist' error. Since when? How come? Will this be fixed?
> > The RFC doesn't seem to say anything about any channel names being illegal.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 Jan 2003 4:54 pm, The Storm Surfer wrote:
> a 'cahannel does not exist' error. Since when? How come? Will this be
> fixed? The RFC doesn't seem to say anything about any channel names being
> illegal.
It's not going to be "fix
> When trying to join channels with ascii character 3 in the name, I now get a
> 'cahannel does not exist' error. Since when? How come? Will this be fixed?
> The RFC doesn't seem to say anything about any channel names being illegal.
Since u2.10.11.03. Because these channel names have been a
The Storm Surfer wrote:
>
> When trying to join channels with ascii character 3 in the name, I now get a
>'cahannel does not exist' error. Since when? How come? Will this be fixed?
ircu on undernet checks for such characters (mirc control characters)
and disallows them, because they can be
