RE: [Coder-Com] Quit messages

2001-10-02 Thread mrosdal
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:52 AM >Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages > > >Disagree. Why hamper what are often not a problem? > >When we start censoring quit messages we have to continue to censor >everything

Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages

2001-10-02 Thread Larry
just filter it out , to a maxlenght in quit msg say to 15 for personal preferences as an example Larry - Original Message - From: "Mark Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bjørn Osdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 02

Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages

2001-10-01 Thread BoD
Plus it's of course a solvable-with-client-script problem BoD - Original Message - From: Mark Foster To: Bjørn Osdal ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages Disagree. Why hamper what are often not a problem? When we

Re: [Coder-Com] Quit messages

2001-10-01 Thread Mark Foster
Disagree. Why hamper what are often not a problem? When we start censoring quit messages we have to continue to censor everything  Sheesh, I can think of bigger deals than the length of quit messages... Mark/BlakJak At 17:52 1/10/01 +0200, Bjørn Osdal wrote: I presume I`m not the only one on u