Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-04 Thread Kev
> > bas's suggestion would. My scheme would drop the A server<->server token > > and use the M token instead. A few more bytes than bas's scheme, but the > > advantage would be that everyone everywhere would see that the user is > > away, though they wouldn't be able to see the away message until

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-04 Thread bas
> > bas wrote: > > >instead of a umode +a, maybe broadcasting a short fake away string like > > >"-"? saving on umode chars and hassle... (making the "is away" remote > > >whois only must be done first anyway) > > > > Wouldn't that still leave HIS broken (since the local server and remote > > serve

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-04 Thread Entrope
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Kev wrote: > > Would "AXAAA A :" break the protocol? > > That also results in a "no longer away" status. There are different parsers for messages from servers and messages from users. Why not take advantage of them? If older ircu will send "AXAAA A :", then the change could

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-04 Thread Kev
> Would "AXAAA A :" break the protocol? That also results in a "no longer away" status. -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-04 Thread volta2
> > > instead of a umode +a, maybe broadcasting a short fake away > > > string like > > > "-"? saving on umode chars and hassle... (making the "is away" remote > > > whois only must be done first anyway) > > > > I believe IRCnet already uses mode +a to indicate away status, and > > perhaps some ot

RE: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread akl
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 06:38, Tom Rons wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bas > > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com]

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Kev
> > instead of a umode +a, maybe broadcasting a short fake away > > string like > > "-"? saving on umode chars and hassle... (making the "is away" remote > > whois only must be done first anyway) > > I believe IRCnet already uses mode +a to indicate away status, and > perhaps some other nets too,

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Kev
> Kev wrote: > > > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > > > available on a /whois , and using a user mode (+a) to > > > mark the user away remotely. This should solve our HIS problems > > > with away messages. (Plain away messages also had potential for > > > break

RE: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Tom Rons
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bas > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers > > instead of a umode +a, maybe broadc

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread s gibinski
Isomer wrote: > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > Kev wrote: > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois , and using a user m

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread bas
Kev wrote: > > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois , and using a user mode (+a)

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Isomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-02 Thread Kev
> If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > at all :) I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only available on a /whois , and using a user mode (+a) to mark the user away remote

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-02 Thread Isomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I notice that when a user sets their away message it propagates to the > remote servers. If a user does not clear their away message, but sets it > to a new one, it updates on the local server *only*. Remote servers still > hold the old away mes

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-02 Thread volta2
You're absolutely right. This breaks HIS. > I notice that when a user sets their away message it propagates to the > remote servers. If a user does not clear their away message, but sets it > to > a new one, it updates on the local server *only*. Remote servers still > hold > the old away mes