Re: [Coder-Com] Ircu2.10.11 and date -s

2002-12-07 Thread Kev
> The latest ircu is having a strange behaviour when the root uses date -s to > set a new time: > After some seconds it drops ALL client- and serverconnections except > operators with a ping timeout. (maybe the cookies expire, but i turned back t > he time > by 1 hour) > Ircu2.10.10 doesn't show s

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11

2002-09-19 Thread Kev
> I am using ircu2.10.11 right now. It's great but I have question. Does it > support other language? Now I can use only English. Please advise. The IRC protocol has no way to specify the user's language. English is the only translation of the notices and numeric replies available. Even if some

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11

2002-09-19 Thread net
Right now, ircu2.10.xx does not have any bilingual support, it's english or don't use. As for your services question, i've never heard of an IRC services package called Services 4.5.39, but I can guareenty since they spit out "compiled for ircu 2.9.32" they will not work on ircu2.10.11 or ircu2.1

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 doesn't resolve hostnames

2002-04-07 Thread mr.volta
That's true. There's the option F:NODNS. I turned it to TRUE because the resolve lasts too long when there's nothing to resolve (it's annoying for EVERY user). But the ircu still doesn't resolve when I turn it off. Btw: my friend runs the same ircu. He has a bind on his machine and the ircu reso

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-17 Thread Bas
Braden Temme wrote: > > I need one more thing then. Lets say we have a hypothetical situation of nine >people in the > channel. Three have ops, three have voice, and three have no status: > > A Opped > B Opped > C Opped > > B Voiced > BAAAB Voiced > BAAAC Voiced > > C

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-17 Thread Tom Rons
> I need one more thing then. Lets say we have a hypothetical situation of nine people in the > channel. Three have ops, three have voice, and three have no status: > > A Opped > B Opped > C Opped > > B Voiced > BAAAB Voiced > BAAAC Voiced > > C Nothing > CAAAB Nothing > CAAA

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Braden Temme
I need one more thing then. Lets say we have a hypothetical situation of nine people in the channel. Three have ops, three have voice, and three have no status: A Opped B Opped C Opped B Voiced BAAAB Voiced BAAAC Voiced C Nothing CAAAB Nothing CAAAC Nothing How would thi

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Greg Sikorski
The ':o' modifier is just a flag, to save space/bandwidth it only indicates a change of state. So, if you see a ':o', or ':v' or ':ov' appended to a numeric, the subsequent numerics will also have that state (op'd, etc) applied to them. That is until you encounter another change of state :) C

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Carlo Wood
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 05:58:50PM -0800, Braden Temme wrote: > I think I found a bug. I noticed that when two servers link up they aren't fully >reporting who is > opped in a channel. In fact, its only reporting one person opped in each channel. > > Server Output: > AC B #chatweb 1016220367 +