On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Andrew Miller wrote:
> MODE #channel +ko something +something someop
> would desync clients - you can't change server-client protocol and not expect
> problems.
If the text were only sent to clients attempting to join the channel, this
is not a problem as the clients currently
Quoting Jeekay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Andrew Miller wrote:
> > MODE #channel +ko something +something someop
> > would desync clients - you can't change server-client protocol and not
> expect
> > problems.
>
> If the text were only sent to clients attempting to join the chann
the topic is for this kind of things, imo. dont add an extra mode for it.
Note to whoever owns the list: Set the Reply-To to the list please :)
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Andrew Miller wrote:
> The original mail suggested implementing this as a channel mode. It would need
> to propagate to other servers, and clients(at least chanops) in the channel
> would need to be informed
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 04:48, Jeekay wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Andrew Miller wrote:
> > MODE #channel +ko something +something someop
> > would desync clients - you can't change server-client protocol and not expect
> > problems.
>
> If the text were only sent to clients attempting to join the c
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Kevin L Mitchell wrote:
> No, the point is that this form of MODE message would itself desync the
> client.
And as I said, my point is that the `key text' would not need to be sent
to clients presently in the channel, so the MODE message they receive as
far as the +k is conce
