Kevin L. Mitchell writes:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:26 -0700, Entrope wrote:
> > Send inter-server PINGs and PONGs with high priority.
>
> Um...one side effect of this will be to reduce the utility of the AsLL
> results. Now we'll know the asymmetric link latency for the high
> priority band, b
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 19:58 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> That occurred to me. Ideally we would have both; manually initiated
> ASLLs already use high priority messages.
We have manually initiated AsLLs? All I'm aware of is the /asll
command, which is supposed to report the most recently collect
While we're thinking about possible enhancements to iauth (c.f., the
discussion about letting iauth also handle server links), I'd be
interested in seeing a new local IRC protocol message to allow opers to
issue commands to iauth...and, obviously, some way for iauth to reply
(reusing the 'C' iauth
