On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:04:10 +1200 you wrote:
> [10:59] ./motd paris*
> [10:59] Permission Denied: You're not an IRC operator
>
> Any reason why motd was part of the pl14/15 mods?
> Remote MOTD would be useful to guests I should think.
We did the same with ircd-hybrid-7. One of the i
> Dirk Moerenhout / System Administrator / Planet Internet NV
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Andrew Miller wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:04:10 +1200 you wrote:
> >
> > > [10:59] ./motd paris*
> > > [10:59] Permission De
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:36:09 -0500 you wrote:
> Hi,
> Dont tell me it's not the right mailing list, i've sent a similar
> msg to gnuworld dlevel mailing list and got no answer so feel free to
> help :)
>
> i'm using Slakware 7.0 2.2.20
> postrgreSQL 7.1.3
> gcc 3.0
> make 3.79
>
> Let's not get carried away here. What we're already doing is hard
> enough; this would just make things orders of magnitude more difficult.
> --
> Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A simple approach(which I am prepared to code at some stage
if no-one has a problem with it) would be to
Quoting Kev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You seem to have fubar'd flood throttling. Here's what I see in beta49:
>
> I get on the server. I manage to get all messages queued up *from* me
> sent on by waiting a while, sending something to the server, etc., until
> my ping time is 0 seconds. Now, I'm
Quoting Sir Vulcan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> sqlUser::loadData> Attempting to load data for user-name: sirvulcan
> sqlUser::loadData> SELECT
>
id,user_name,password,url,language_id,flags,last_updated_by,last_updated,email,maxlogins
>
> FROM users WHERE lower(user_name) = 'sirvulcan'
> cmaster::
Quoting The legend of the darkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fellow ircu hackers,
>
> I'am thinking moving NICKLEN, USERLEN, HOSTLEN, ACCOUNTLEN, REALLEN,
> PASSWDLEN, AWAYLEN, TOPICLEN, NETWORK, URL_CLIENTS to ircu feature lines.
>
> The target ircu will be .12 (pre-alpha)
>
> What is your opini
- Forwarded message from Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 02:47:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PROTO-DESC] CAPAB draft 00 - Comments Needed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey All,
We really need to hea
Resending minus some LT/GT around e-mail addresses, because the previous one
seems to have been a false positive in the HTML detect rules.
- Forwarded message from Andrew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:39:55 +1300
From: Andrew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
Quoting stoney` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well technically since cservice issues usernames that allow users to mode
> +x, they need to be notified when there's credible evidence of abuse.
> Unfortunately, the only way to confirm abuse is by having an IRCop check
> user@hosts of clones and then report
Quoting Sofie Van Tendeloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> in #cservice they say 45
> here they say 50
> and someone else said unlimited
>
> Make up your mind please...
There is no code in mod.cservice/BANCommand.cc to limit the number of bans, and
there exists no reply in the translations table to
Quoting Sofie Van Tendeloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey Andrew,
> (mind if I call you Andrew? *grin* :P )
>
> I can see you know a lot about X and the coder stuff so I thought
> let me direct this silly question right to himself as I'm a bit =
> embarresed to send my questions always directly
Quoting Alexander Maassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:13:06AM +1300, Andrew Miller wrote:
> >
> > Attached is the code to kill a ghost logged in to your account, when you
> log in
> > to mod.cservice. It is designed to get around a problem caus
Quoting "yassine.E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> first id like to say i m real thankfull for the work your doing guys and
> i hope you will keep on the top
> well the subject of mail tell sonme about the reason i write it
> as i was in the channel it has been flooded so i was thinking we can
> avoid t
Quoting Jeekay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Andrew Miller wrote:
> > MODE #channel +ko something +something someop
> > would desync clients - you can't change server-client protocol and not
> expect
> > problems.
>
> If the text were on
Carlo Wood wrote:
>[10:13] -helsinki.fi.eu.undernet.org/Wallops- Protocol Violation from culay18:
>culay18 tried to CREATE a channel already joined
>[10:13] -Lelystad.NL.EU.Undernet.org/Wallops- Protocol Violation from culay18:
>culay18 tried to CREATE a channel already joined
>[10:13] -London2.
Progs wrote:
>Hi,
>
>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so ABAAA
>doesn't see A's join.
>
>Bug
Andrew Miller wrote:
>Progs wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>>When A speaks on #fo
Progs wrote:
>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:40:56 +1300
>Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>There are several fixes:
>>Fix A: We need to globally synchronise delayed state, which means that
>>we need to transmit it in BURST. We can then apply the "
Hi all,
Currently, the OVERRIDE checks allowing PRIV_WALK_LCHAN operators to
join local channels do not work if the real channel key is OVERRIDE.
This is correct if the key is OVERRIDE and that is the only impediment
to joining. However, when there is another additional impediment, such
as a ban a
Michael Poole wrote:
>Andrew Miller writes:
>
>
>
>>Progs wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>>>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>&g
21 matches
Mail list logo
