On 20 Jun 2006, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the MT tools are clever enough to tell you which tests are most
> worthwhile -- but I doubt it. The mutations I've heard about (though
> probably not all of the ones that are used) are fairly simplistic and don't
> seem to be the s
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:26:08PM +1000, Adelle Hartley wrote:
> > Does anyone here have any expereince with mutation testing,
> > (http://benno.id.au/blog/2006/06/18/mutants), or have any
> > opinions on it?
>
> Intriguing, but I have doubts about it being a sensible path.
>
> Surely, for any
