Re: [codezero-devel] patch: support for using non-bare tool chains for the kernel

2011-09-11 Thread Amit Mahajan
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 10:25 +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:10 +0200, Norman Feske wrote: > > Codezero expects the tool chain to be used for the kernel to not support > > shared libraries. (this is the case for Codesourcery's arm-none-eabi > > tool chain) Such tool chains use

Re: [codezero-devel] patch: support for using non-bare tool chains for the kernel

2011-09-11 Thread Amit Mahajan
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:10 +0200, Norman Feske wrote: > Codezero expects the tool chain to be used for the kernel to not support > shared libraries. (this is the case for Codesourcery's arm-none-eabi > tool chain) Such tool chains use to incorporate both libgcc and > libgcc_eh into the single libg

Re: [codezero-devel] patch: Build userlibs w/o the tool chain's libc headers

2011-09-11 Thread Amit Mahajan
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 11:59 +0200, Norman Feske wrote: > The userlibs are build with w/o '-nostdinc'. Consequently, the standard > search paths of the tool chain are used. Because the user land is > normally build with the Codesourcery tool chain > 'arm-none-linux-gnueabi', the complete glibc heade

Re: [codezero-devel] patch: SCons 2.0.1

2011-09-11 Thread Amit Mahajan
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:00 +0200, Norman Feske wrote: > SCons 2.0.1 complains about the 'build_dir' argument being renamed to > 'variant_dir'. This patch renames the argument where needed for building > the kernel and the default container (the components needed for Genode). > Ack. Merged. --