Re: [codezero-devel] Baremetal questions

2011-03-15 Thread John van V.
I have not seen the word "baremetal" for a decade. LibOS and ExoOS are the two bit strings that I associate with them. Are they still in play? There was talk about implementing a VM with registers-only, and not stacks, with compiler designs initially for a Linux BIOS. The best idea I can support

Re: Codezero future plans.

2010-12-03 Thread John van V.
Hello, these are my thoughts on CodeZero's open/closed dilemma. Bahadir writes: "One challenge is that when you open up, there is very few people who would appreciate and make a meaningful understanding or contribution to the project." With 15 years doing open work within the "big money" of Wall

Re: Codezero future plans.

2010-11-27 Thread John van V.
Harold Grovesteen responded: "And moving from Linux to L4 is important why? Maybe I just do not understand the context of 'community' in your response." Community consists of people and people use people-oriented systems. Therefore the system has to be oriented to the people. A monolithic ker

Re: Codezero future plans.

2010-11-27 Thread John van V.
I think codezero success is crucial as it has the only posix implementation that is necessary to transition the community from Linux to L4. On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:41 PM, d...@ucore.info wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering about the future of Codezero project. > > I recently bought a BeagleBoard-x