Hello list!
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:07:20PM +0100, Max Henkel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:17:35PM +0100, Florian Forster wrote:
[...]
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:49:02PM +0100, Max Henkel wrote:
[...]
@@ -2842,6 +2929,8 @@ static int network_config (oconfig_item_t *ci) /*
{{{
Hi Max,
thanks for your patch :)
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:49:02PM +0100, Max Henkel wrote:
+#if KERNEL_LINUX
+ struct ip_mreqn mreq;
+#else
+ struct ip_mreq mreq;
+#endif
As far as I see, the only difference between the two structs is the
imr_address, which you
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:17:35PM +0100, Florian Forster wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:49:02PM +0100, Max Henkel wrote:
+ if (! IN_MULTICAST (ntohl (addr-sin_addr.s_addr)))
+ return (0);
Doesn't it make sense to be able to set the interface in unicast
Hi octo and list!
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:17:35PM +0100, Florian Forster wrote:
[...]
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:49:02PM +0100, Max Henkel wrote:
+#if KERNEL_LINUX
+ struct ip_mreqn mreq;
+#else
+ struct ip_mreq mreq;
+#endif
As far as I see, the only
