ad-m opened a new issue #270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/issues/270
Hello,
I suggest add to dropdown of version link to master version (
https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ ) of documentation:
tanjinP commented on a change in pull request #9079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9079#discussion_r450571991
##
File path: docs/howto/operator/kubernetes.rst
##
@@ -25,180 +25,90 @@ KubernetesPodOperator
The
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #9703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9703#issuecomment-654550260
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
hlokired opened a new issue #9703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9703
Hi Team,
We have a requirement that we need to schedule a Airflow Job on last
Thursday of every month.
So basically we might have 4 or 5 Thursdays depends on the month.
how can it be
chipmyersjr opened a new pull request #9702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9702
Add unit test for mlengine_operator_utils.py. Mentioned as missing unit test
in issue #8278
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17152372#comment-17152372
]
Sandish Kumar HN commented on AIRFLOW-4484:
---
Hi Everyone,
We are facing the same issue. here
manesioz commented on pull request #9698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9698#issuecomment-654505904
@mik-laj Yep! Good catch, done.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mik-laj commented on issue #9700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9700#issuecomment-654503157
Here is fix: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7570
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
mik-laj commented on pull request #9651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9651#issuecomment-654496647
@OmairK Example tasks for the rest operators will be helpful.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mik-laj commented on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-654495870
Yes. We can discuss it here. If we want to have more opinions, we can ask on
the mailing list later. For non-key design discussions, Github is a good
place. If you prefer, you can
OmairK commented on pull request #9651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9651#issuecomment-654495526
> I have the impression that there are more DLP operators but they are not
covered in the example DAG. I think we should add the documentation. I'm ok
with not extending the DAG
jhtimmins commented on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-654493759
Gotcha, thanks. Is this issue the best place to discuss the design? Thinking
I can design interface and 1-2 implementations.
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9549#discussion_r450508757
##
File path: docs/howto/use-alternative-secrets-backend.rst
##
@@ -118,9 +123,6 @@ The following is a sample JSON file.
The YAML file structure is
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9549#discussion_r450508575
##
File path: docs/howto/use-alternative-secrets-backend.rst
##
@@ -92,10 +95,12 @@ file ``/files/my_conn.json`` when it looks for connections.
The
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9549#discussion_r450508103
##
File path: docs/howto/use-alternative-secrets-backend.rst
##
@@ -92,10 +95,12 @@ file ``/files/my_conn.json`` when it looks for connections.
The
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9549#discussion_r450508103
##
File path: docs/howto/use-alternative-secrets-backend.rst
##
@@ -92,10 +95,12 @@ file ``/files/my_conn.json`` when it looks for connections.
The
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9549#discussion_r450508103
##
File path: docs/howto/use-alternative-secrets-backend.rst
##
@@ -92,10 +95,12 @@ file ``/files/my_conn.json`` when it looks for connections.
The
OmairK commented on pull request #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9277#issuecomment-654492386
> Hiello.
> We have updated FAB to v3, so we use marshmallow v3. Can you rebase on the
latest master?
> Thanks!
Rebased and pushed :grinning:
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9549#discussion_r450507440
##
File path: docs/howto/use-alternative-secrets-backend.rst
##
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ This backend is especially useful in the following use cases:
To use
mik-laj commented on pull request #9473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9473#issuecomment-654487881
爛
I am waiting for CI results.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mik-laj commented on pull request #9698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9698#issuecomment-654487591
Can you also update docs here?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1d36b0303b8632fce6de78ca4e782ae26ee06fea/airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/vision.py#L428
OmairK commented on pull request #9473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9473#issuecomment-654487056
> Hiello.
> We have updated FAB to v3, so we use marshmallow v3. Can you rebase on the
latest master?
> Thanks!
Done :smile:
mik-laj commented on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-654487020
@jhtimmins Authorization core, i.e. one authorization mechanism (e.g. via
HTTP headers) and the ability to choose others using the configuration options.
mik-laj edited a comment on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-609051162
I think we can add a simple decorator that will call functions before
handling requests. This function will be responsible for checking the
credentials and setting the user
jhtimmins commented on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-654485175
@mik-laj Cool. Do you mean the core of authentication or the core of the API?
This is an automated message from
mik-laj commented on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-654484623
@jhtimmins I wanted to start working on the core today or Wednesday.
However, if you have time, you can start working.
jhtimmins commented on issue #8111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8111#issuecomment-654479575
@mik-laj I'm interested in taking over this task. Is the API at a stage
where this would be helpful?
This is an
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #9701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9701#issuecomment-654454430
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
dwjoss opened a new pull request #9701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9701
The previously-listed person is no longer at the company
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x]
madison-ookla commented on issue #9655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9655#issuecomment-654449416
From what we have seen, a -9 code indicates that it is an OOM issue. We have
not seen a -9 occur in any other circumstances. It seems like for python, a -9
indicates a memory
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #9586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9586#issuecomment-654443547
Can I close this? It seems not needed anymore because I didn't experience
any related issue when I generated requirements recently.
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #9503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9503#discussion_r450454551
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##
@@ -69,24 +61,24 @@ def get_dag_runs(session, dag_id, start_date_gte=None,
ephraimbuddy closed pull request #9503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9503
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17152279#comment-17152279
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-5266:
-
lindsable commented on pull request #6075:
URL:
lindsable commented on pull request #6075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6075#issuecomment-654433853
@ashb I'm sure things have been busy for you organizing the summit, but I'd
really like to get this merged. Please let me know what I can do.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 631ac48 Some Pylint fixes in
kaxil merged pull request #9674:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9674
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9503#discussion_r450417748
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##
@@ -69,24 +61,24 @@ def get_dag_runs(session, dag_id, start_date_gte=None,
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9503#discussion_r450417748
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##
@@ -69,24 +61,24 @@ def get_dag_runs(session, dag_id, start_date_gte=None,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17152260#comment-17152260
]
Jake Puffer commented on AIRFLOW-2143:
--
I'm getting this exact behavior in Airflow 1.10.10, but in
royberkoweee commented on pull request #9667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9667#issuecomment-654415566
Hey, is the reason for these failures related to master?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
potiuk edited a comment on issue #9324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9324#issuecomment-654410261
Heloy yes. The general issues and questions are not handled via the Github
issue. It is actually stated when you try to open such issue. Apologise if it
was not clear. I
potiuk commented on issue #9324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9324#issuecomment-654410261
Heloy yes. The general issues and questions are not handled via the Github
issue. It is actually stated when you try to open such issue. Apologise if it
was not clear. I closed a
KayleMaster commented on issue #9324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9324#issuecomment-654408684
Care to elaborate why this issue is closed? I can't find any help on the
slack channel
This is an automated
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9503#discussion_r450417748
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##
@@ -69,24 +61,24 @@ def get_dag_runs(session, dag_id, start_date_gte=None,
potiuk commented on pull request #9648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9648#issuecomment-654406616
Fantastic!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
mik-laj commented on pull request #9473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9473#issuecomment-654406329
Hiello.
We have updated FAB to v3, so we use marshmallow v3. Can you rebase on the
latest master?
Thanks!
mik-laj commented on pull request #9322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9322#issuecomment-654406266
Hiello.
We have updated FAB to v3, so we use marshmallow v3. Can you rebase on the
latest master?
Thanks!
mik-laj commented on pull request #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9277#issuecomment-654406104
Hiello.
We have updated FAB to v3, so we use marshmallow v3. Can you rebase on the
latest master?
Thanks!
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new e764ea5 Update FlaskAppBuilder to v3
mik-laj merged pull request #9648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9648
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 72abf82 Tests should also be triggered when
potiuk merged pull request #9690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9690
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
mik-laj commented on pull request #9295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9295#issuecomment-654400905
You need to add this package to index:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/docs/autoapi_templates/index.rst
jkbngl commented on pull request #9295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9295#issuecomment-654397085
Hi @mik-laj this actually helped a lot clarified a lot of things for me!
Thank you very much!
So what I understood is that transfer operators should go into the
prasanthbangs2016 opened a new issue #9700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9700
PS C:\Users\prasanth\Desktop\p> docker logs -f 5b560ac952ff
[2020-07-06 18:24:00,905] {{settings.py:253}} INFO -
settings.configure_orm(): Using pool settings. pool_size=5, max_overflow=10,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #9700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9700#issuecomment-654395483
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
mik-laj edited a comment on issue #8280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8280#issuecomment-654394285
@irvifa Some examples are still missing. I updated the first post.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/tests/test_project_structure.py#L125
mik-laj commented on issue #8280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8280#issuecomment-654394285
@irvifa Some examples are still missing
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/tests/test_project_structure.py#L125
irvifa commented on issue #8280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8280#issuecomment-654384993
I saw there's many PR that have been merged. Is this issue already closed
then?
This is an automated message from
potiuk commented on pull request #9667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9667#issuecomment-654377704
Not sure. I think it could be some Github Actions hiccup
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
madison-ookla commented on pull request #9671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9671#issuecomment-654346744
I agree with @mik-laj on this one, we have one instance where we have 4
dynamic dags that generate hundreds of DAGs with quite varied templated SQL.
Viewing these queries
dossett commented on a change in pull request #9593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9593#discussion_r450344785
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/operators/dataproc.py
##
@@ -502,32 +506,79 @@ def __init__(self,
self.timeout = timeout
mik-laj commented on pull request #9618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9618#issuecomment-654341478
I sent DM to you. ;-)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
royberkoweee commented on pull request #9667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9667#issuecomment-654338741
Any reason for some checks being cancelled?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
vuppalli commented on pull request #9618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9618#issuecomment-654336203
@mik-laj Yes, thank you!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
zikun opened a new pull request #9699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9699
Fixes #9609
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for
mik-laj commented on pull request #9618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9618#issuecomment-654334040
@vuppalli Are you available on our official Airflow Slack channel?
https://apache-airflow-slack.herokuapp.com/ If you plan to contribute more to
Airflow, we can coordinate my
potiuk commented on issue #9558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9558#issuecomment-654334121
Go for it @manesioz !
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
zikun commented on issue #9609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9609#issuecomment-654331653
I just realize your case is a little different. You must have set
`default_timezone` in the Airflow config. I think we should fix it in
`TimeSensor` itself. I'll make a quick PR
zhongjiajie commented on pull request #8231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8231#issuecomment-654326927
I think this patch could be accept. In L1529, we delete all tag in dag and
in L1532 we create all new tag object and add all of them to `dag_tag` table.
And this patch just
manesioz opened a new pull request #9698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9698
Fixes #9558
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [ ] Description above provides context of the change
- [ ] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #9698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9698#issuecomment-654326453
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #9631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9631#discussion_r450318520
##
File path: airflow/task/context/current.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor
casassg commented on a change in pull request #9631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9631#discussion_r450301293
##
File path: airflow/task/context/current.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Review comment:
I
vuppalli commented on pull request #9618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9618#issuecomment-654305242
@mik-laj Thanks so much for your response. I am not sure which files are
needed to run the tests so I do not know if they have changed. The only file I
have contributed to is
aneesh-joseph commented on pull request #9688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9688#issuecomment-654303406
@potiuk @dimberman - can you have a look at this one as well
This is an automated message from the
royberkoweee commented on pull request #9667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9667#issuecomment-654303405
Done. Waiting for CI to run :)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
zikun opened a new pull request #9697:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9697
Closes #9609
This handles some cases for which `TimeSensor` is not suited. For example,
if a DAG is scheduled to run at 23:00 daily, but one of the tasks is required
to run at 01:00 next day:
manesioz commented on issue #9558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9558#issuecomment-654301476
I'd like to take a stab at it if no one else is working on it.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
turbaszek commented on pull request #9631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9631#issuecomment-654300299
@casassg @jonathanshir happy to get your reviews
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
turbaszek commented on pull request #8651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8651#issuecomment-654299368
Depends on #9631
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a commit to branch v1-10-stable
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v1-10-stable by this push:
new f55906c re-adds
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #9692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9692#discussion_r450279545
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1486,13 +1486,16 @@ def _process_executor_events(self, simple_dag_bag,
session=None):
"""
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9692#discussion_r450275776
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1486,13 +1486,16 @@ def _process_executor_events(self, simple_dag_bag,
session=None):
"""
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #9692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9692#discussion_r450275776
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1486,13 +1486,16 @@ def _process_executor_events(self, simple_dag_bag,
session=None):
"""
turbaszek commented on issue #9689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9689#issuecomment-654284689
> How come we do not catch it with the tests :)
I would say: mocking. There's `test_process_executor_events` test but there
the in-memory and db state are the same
kaxil edited a comment on pull request #9691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9691#issuecomment-654279700
We do get it now too on Airflow 1.10.10:
```
❯ airflow scheduler
_
|__( )_ __/__ / __
kaxil edited a comment on pull request #9691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9691#issuecomment-654279700
We do get it now too on Airflow 1.10.10:
```
❯ airflow scheduler
_
|__( )_ __/__ / __
kaxil commented on pull request #9691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9691#issuecomment-654279700
We do get it now too:
```
❯ airflow scheduler
_
|__( )_ __/__ / __
/| |_ /__ ___/_ /_
mik-laj commented on pull request #9648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9648#issuecomment-654278028
It took me some time to check if the Javascript code was working correctly,
but everything looks very good. Nice change!
mik-laj removed a comment on pull request #9648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9648#issuecomment-654278028
It took me some time to check if the Javascript code was working correctly,
but everything looks very good. Nice change!
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
turbaszek pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 7888145 Remove XCom CUD endpoints (#9661)
vuppalli closed pull request #9696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9696
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
turbaszek merged pull request #9661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9661
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
vuppalli opened a new pull request #9696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9696
Fixed trailing white spaces as per comments on upstream PR.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17152058#comment-17152058
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-3964:
-
ryw commented on pull request #5499:
URL:
ryw commented on pull request #5499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5499#issuecomment-654271475
@YingboWang is this PR ready to be reviewed/merged?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #9695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9695#issuecomment-654263742
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
Datkros opened a new pull request #9695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9695
Added support to inject the remote logging configuration into the
`airflow.cfg` configmap. I kept it backwards compatible with the current
version of the chart by not dropping the
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
