hadoken69 commented on issue #18267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18267#issuecomment-1003918187
> @amaterasu-coder are you working on this issue?
No
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
tanelk commented on pull request #19747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19747#issuecomment-1003897449
> Tests are failing, can you take a look plz @tanelk
I fixed the merge issue. The `test_scheduler_job` suite passes now.
--
This is an automated message from the
yuqian90 commented on issue #13827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13827#issuecomment-1003895321
> Hey @yuqian90 , did the proposed solution work for you locally? Do you
think we should make a PR to fix?
>
> (Apologies couldn't reply here earlier)
Hi, @kaxil,
Bowrna commented on pull request #20066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20066#issuecomment-1003884390
> Yeah @Bowrna I will wake up in 6 hours, I will ping you to test together
. Thanks for let me know :)
Sure @edithturn we can work when you are free on this. I will
Bowrna commented on issue #20252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20252#issuecomment-1003884195
@potiuk I will pick up this task. Could you tell me the right flag name in
the .build directory which indicates ASCIIART enable/disable state? Right now I
don't see any relevant
edithturn commented on pull request #20066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20066#issuecomment-1003883741
Yeah @Bowrna I will wake up in 6 hours, I will ping you to test together
. Thanks for let me know :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Bowrna commented on pull request #20066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20066#issuecomment-1003883151
I am currently working on this task. With traces I have generated with help
from @edithturn I will first try to fix that code and try working along with
Edith to see if it
uranusjr commented on issue #19903:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19903#issuecomment-1003874514
I don’t recall any logic checking a function’s content, so this is very
surprising. I can reproduce though; it seems like if the function does not have
a body, even the _task_
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new fc38490 Updating
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #20578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20578#discussion_r777288232
##
File path: airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/kubernetes_pod.py
##
@@ -348,15 +351,17 @@ def launcher(self) ->
ashb opened a new pull request #18797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18797
Previously we pinned this version as v12 as a change to Kube library
internals meant v1.Pod objects now have a logger object inside them, and
couldn't be pickled on Python 3.6.
To fix that
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from f668fa7 Generate constraints in PRs when upgrading dependencies
(#20624)
add 138f38f Fix mypy errors in
uranusjr merged pull request #20482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20482
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20625#discussion_r777283387
##
File path: airflow/providers/qubole/operators/qubole.py
##
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ class QuboleOperator(BaseOperator):
'cluster_label',
)
auvipy commented on a change in pull request #19703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19703#discussion_r777275872
##
File path: setup.py
##
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ def write_version(filename: str = os.path.join(*[my_dir,
"airflow", "git_version
auvipy commented on pull request #19703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19703#issuecomment-1003809598
actually it contains several memory leaks/usage issues in amqp & redis & 1
moderate but very old security issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18670#issuecomment-1003799523
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #19536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19536
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rsg17 commented on a change in pull request #20542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20542#discussion_r777262111
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/suite/hooks/calendar.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+#
khalidmammadov commented on issue #19891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19891#issuecomment-1003788264
@potiuk What's the communities view on [PEP
585](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0585/)? Looks like there will be
another large refactoring needed to remove these type
khalidmammadov opened a new pull request #20625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20625
Part of https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19891
- Fixed type of a field in a sub-class as super class was changed
- Applied `tuple` conversion to adhere to the type of the
xiaoxugao commented on issue #16610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16610#issuecomment-1003784507
Hey, is this issue solved? I still have the same problem as
@SamiRehmanNostra .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
khalidmammadov commented on issue #19891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19891#issuecomment-1003782683
I have started looking into `airflow/providers/qubole`. Please let me know
if anyone is looking at it already
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003782233
Could it be the scheduler settings?:
```
# [scheduler]
airflow_scheduler_job_heartbeat_sec: 5
airflow_scheduler_clean_tis_without_dagrun_interval: 15.0
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003782233
Could it be one of these settings:
```
# [scheduler]
airflow_scheduler_job_heartbeat_sec: 5
airflow_scheduler_clean_tis_without_dagrun_interval: 15.0
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003780682
I'm sorry, I didn't intend this to turn into an unpaid debugging session,
and it looks like a cosmetic problem more than anything. So I'm comfortable
closing this thread if you
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003779286
> 1. Do you actually have scheduler running at all? Does it have
coninuous access to the DB?
Yes, the scheduler is visible in the running processes, and also
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003776503
Apache Airflow
version| 2.2.3
executor | LocalExecutor
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003776503
```
Apache Airflow
version| 2.2.3
executor | LocalExecutor
t4n1o removed a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003725072
Here is the code for the two tasks:
Python archives mirror:
https://gist.github.com/t4n1o/301e492106f54d185d726cc4bd9df1c1
Rust parser:
moshederri removed a comment on issue #19903:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19903#issuecomment-1003771492
Quick question about this - i tried changing the content of the function to
something other than `pass` or `print` but for some reason i am still getting
the same
moshederri edited a comment on issue #19903:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19903#issuecomment-1003771492
Quick question about this - i tried changing the content of the function to
something other than `pass` or `print` but for some reason i am still getting
the same
moshederri commented on issue #19903:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19903#issuecomment-1003771492
Quick question about this - i tried changing the content of the function to
something other than `pass` or `print` but for some reason i am still getting
the same exception
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20482#discussion_r777248907
##
File path: airflow/utils/context.pyi
##
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class VariableAccessor:
class ConnectionAccessor:
def get(self, key: str,
potiuk commented on pull request #19703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19703#issuecomment-1003763949
That should be enough @auvipy !
Looks good all tests passed. Anyone knows any potential problem involved
with it ?
When we merge it, we will have to refresh the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17467689#comment-17467689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4922:
-
derkuci commented on pull request #6722:
URL:
derkuci commented on pull request #6722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6722#issuecomment-1003763219
@xuemengran nvm. I guess you meant the PR suggested here. I tried that;
the log table has changed, and I couldn't match the information easily. The
`execution_date` column
potiuk commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003760088
> I'm not sure how airflow is intended to be used, but sometimes people find
other use cases for a tool they haven't designed.
>
> We run a task that can take a few hours to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17467682#comment-17467682
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4922:
-
derkuci commented on pull request #6722:
URL:
derkuci commented on pull request #6722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6722#issuecomment-1003754230
> In the 2.1.1 version, I tried to modify the
airflow/utils/log/file_task_handler.py file to obtain the hostname information
by reading the log table. I confirmed through
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new ac63204 Updating
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003725511
What I do find use for in airflow
- keeping track of tasks
- sending emails when a task fails
- running the tasks every day like cron + a nice ui
--
This is an automated
t4n1o edited a comment on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003724797
I'm not sure how airflow is intended to be used, but sometimes people find
other use cases for a tool they haven't designed.
We run a task that can take a few hours
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003725072
Here is the code for the two tasks:
Python archives mirror:
https://gist.github.com/t4n1o/301e492106f54d185d726cc4bd9df1c1
Rust parser:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new f668fa7 Generate constraints in PRs when
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003724797
I'm not sure how airflow is intended to be useful, but sometimes people find
other use cases for a tool they haven't designed.
We run a task that can take a few hours to
potiuk merged pull request #20624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20624
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
t4n1o commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003723593
```
from datetime import timedelta
from airflow import DAG
from airflow.operators.bash import BashOperator
from airflow.utils.dates import days_ago
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 341f85e Updating
mariotaddeucci commented on issue #20615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20615#issuecomment-1003714559
#20506 all good o/
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
mik-laj closed issue #8715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8715
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
auvipy commented on pull request #19703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19703#issuecomment-1003704625
let me know what else needs to be updated
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 9265ba3 Update pre-commit hooks (#20623)
add e877e7a Fix flaky sensor test (#20617)
No new revisions were
potiuk merged pull request #20617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20617
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20624#issuecomment-1003704212
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 9265ba3 Update pre-commit hooks (#20623)
mik-laj merged pull request #20623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20623
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
saveriogzz commented on issue #20615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20615#issuecomment-1003703918
#20164 all good! ✅
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20617#issuecomment-1003699131
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk opened a new pull request #20624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20624
The constraints generation was only happening in push/scheduled
runs, but sometimes it is useful to check what constraints would
be generated even in the PRs that change setup.py/setup.cfg
potiuk commented on issue #19192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19192#issuecomment-1003697121
I think you are misusing Airlfow. Airlfow by definition can run multiple
tasks even with single local executor, so you are likely misunderstanding how
airflow operators are run
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20623#issuecomment-1003696251
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 567228e Fix empty excludes in selective checks (#20622)
add d823cf7 Fix generation of "Status provider" issue
mik-laj opened a new pull request #20623:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20623
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from f011f66 Add twine check for provider packages (#20619)
add 567228e Fix empty excludes in selective checks
potiuk merged pull request #20621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20621
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 5eccb53 Fix flaky dask executor test (#20620)
add f011f66 Add twine check for provider packages (#20619)
No
potiuk merged pull request #20622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20622
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk merged pull request #20619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20619
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
PApostol commented on issue #20615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20615#issuecomment-1003690469
#19978 addresses the issue and works as expected.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #19508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19508#discussion_r777188126
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/bigquery.py
##
@@ -161,6 +161,23 @@ def get_client(self, project_id: Optional[str] = None,
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #19508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19508#discussion_r777187783
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/bigquery.py
##
@@ -161,6 +161,23 @@ def get_client(self, project_id: Optional[str] = None,
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #19508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19508#discussion_r777187653
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/bigquery.py
##
@@ -161,6 +161,23 @@ def get_client(self, project_id: Optional[str] = None,
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #19508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19508#discussion_r777187252
##
File path: tests/providers/google/cloud/hooks/test_bigquery.py
##
@@ -1837,3 +1840,38 @@ def test_create_external_table_description(self,
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20619#issuecomment-1003688055
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20621#issuecomment-1003687855
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20622#issuecomment-1003687635
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk commented on pull request #20622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20622#issuecomment-1003686839
Example errors: https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/1644533214
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
potiuk opened a new pull request #20622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20622
After removing Python 3.6, some of the excludes have been
empty - which caused error when evaluating combinations to run
im main or when FULL_TESTS were needed.
This PR brings sane
91 matches
Mail list logo
