jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-498105763
Looks like this was reimplemented in #5327. Thanks @BasPH.
This is
jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-490177519
@mik-laj: I hadn't changed all the named tuples in tests, but now I've gone
through and dropped all uses of `collections.namedtuple`.
jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-486064887
This should be ready to go now that #5090 is finished. cc @Fokko @kaxil
jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-482631271
Looks like #5090 will fix the kubernetes tests here.
This is an
jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-48189
Added some typed namedtuples. Since we're supporting python3.5, we can't use
variable annotations, so I used the backwards-compatible
jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-479606123
Thanks @ashb, I backed out variable annotations, and tests are passing on
3.5.x.
jmcarp commented on issue #5030: [AIRFLOW-4227] Use python3-style type
annotations.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5030#issuecomment-479310246
Thanks @BasPH. Also, will we support python3.5 in the future? If so, we can
use function annotations but not variable annotations.
