github-actions[bot] closed pull request #36319: [WIP] Mapping tasks from
ObjectStoragePath
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #36319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319#issuecomment-2016205587
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #36319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319#issuecomment-1928542976
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
hussein-awala commented on PR #36319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319#issuecomment-1868138890
> Doing this on a path feels a bit wrong since a path doesn’t inheritly hold
any information on the thing it points to. Bolke and I were discussing we need
something on top of
bolkedebruin commented on PR #36319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319#issuecomment-1866055628
Mmm yes. Looking a the thread on Slack the issue is the size of the list, so
it becomes a bit hard to do a
```python
def get_files(p: ObjectStoragePath) ->
uranusjr commented on PR #36319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319#issuecomment-1864169783
Doing this on a path feels a bit wrong since a path doesn’t inheritly hold
any information on the thing it points to. Bolke and I were discussing we need
something on top of path that
hussein-awala opened a new pull request, #36319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36319
As discussed on
[Slack](https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CCPRP7943/p1696584611030439?thread_ts=1696535089.906339=CCPRP7943),
this PR implements mapping from files using the new
