rchangj commented on issue #17558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17558#issuecomment-898195873
Hi,
I updated to the latest airflow 2.1.2. I got this error:
Python version: 3.7.10
Airflow version: 2.1.2
Node: ip-10-77-52-33.vpc.internal
mik-laj commented on pull request #17591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17591#issuecomment-898119170
@potiuk @kaxil Updated PR description.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
rchangj commented on issue #17558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17558#issuecomment-898201909
Providers info:
apache-airflow-providers-amazon==2.1.0
apache-airflow-providers-apache-hdfs==2.0.0
apache-airflow-providers-ftp==2.0.0
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-2-1
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-2-1 by this push:
new d2c6feb Updating
rchangj removed a comment on issue #17558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17558#issuecomment-898195873
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r688203241
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/eks.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
roestzwiee edited a comment on issue #15340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15340#issuecomment-897729319
tldr;
@autarchprinceps
I'm having the same trouble here. When deploying the chart to our local
machines all runs fine. But deploying the chart to our cluster
duc-luong-tnsl commented on issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568#issuecomment-897642286
Thank you @potiuk ,
I would like to contribute to Airflow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk commented on pull request #17578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17578#issuecomment-897668062
Should be good to go - I quarantined the "mark_success_no_kill" now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
ephraimbuddy opened a new pull request #17581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17581
This PR removes the use of multiprocessing in TestLocalTaskJob and improves
the test to be more reliable
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #17580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17580#issuecomment-897708820
Hi @potiuk, I have been working on these tests and I think we should try my
solution before we quarantine樂
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
saimon46 opened a new issue #17582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17582
**Description**
Add a proper `params` configuration in the trigger page of a DAG showing the
dict without the serialisation format `__var` and `__type` but with a flat,
normal dict.
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17582#issuecomment-897722963
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
eladkal commented on pull request #17576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17576#issuecomment-897731012
The discussion in the issue is pretty extensive. I want to ask/offer another
point of view on this functionality.
We have `VerticaToMySqlOperator` - This operator has pre &
potiuk closed issue #17571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17571
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #17571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17571#issuecomment-897746081
Well. It is as intended. Click on other section to expand it or to navigate
out and it will be gone. The "exxpansion" indicates really the document section
you are in so even if
uranusjr commented on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-897654921
Yeah they are failing on `main` as well, I think we recently changed
something that caused a SQL incompatibility in the Python 3.6 + MySQL
combination. I plan to take a look
kaxil merged pull request #17567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17567
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17567#issuecomment-897656715
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 4556828 AIP-39: DagRun.data_interval_start|end
uranusjr merged pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr closed issue #16372:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16372
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr closed issue #16304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16304
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ashb commented on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-897678067
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
luoyuliuyin commented on issue #17535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17535#issuecomment-897730415
> > > Okay, I have drafted a PR.
>
> Your changes are looking good. Care to open a full PR to review?
Okay, the PR address is:
potiuk commented on issue #17546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17546#issuecomment-897731840
Hmm. Then I guess the bug is in one of the libraries added:
`gconf-service libasound2 libatk1.0-0 libcairo2 libcups2 libfontconfig1
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libgtk-3-0 libnspr4
ashb opened a new pull request #17577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17577
All but one test in test_scheduler_job.py wants to operate on serialized
dags, so it makes sense to have this be done in the dag_maker for us, to
make each test "smaller".
---
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17577#issuecomment-897623173
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17577#discussion_r687693111
##
File path: tests/conftest.py
##
@@ -451,34 +451,60 @@ def dag_maker(request):
The dag_maker.create_dagrun takes the same arguments as
amit-talreja commented on pull request #17567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17567#issuecomment-897623958
Not to mention @kaxil .
It was way small but I am looking forward to contribute as much I can.
Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
potiuk commented on issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568#issuecomment-897637467
Yep. I just added a better diagnostics in this case in #17578. This should
perform the validation at an earlier stage - when the task group is parsed,
rather than when the task is
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-897654921
Yeah they are failing on `main` as well, I think we recently changed
something that caused a SQL incompatibility in the Python 3.8 + MySQL
combination. I plan to take
kaxil commented on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-897664981
We can probably merge this PR in that case
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
potiuk opened a new issue #17579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17579
Happens to be flaky:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17578/checks?check_run_id=3312137736#step:6:4809
```
__ TestLocalTaskJob.test_mark_success_no_kill
potiuk opened a new pull request #17580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17580
This test is flaky.
Logging it in: #17579
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #17581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17581#issuecomment-897738711
Hmm, got a failure locally now after several runs
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
potiuk commented on pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545#issuecomment-897519700
So we went very far from throwing exception in a method :). I think we are
talking about two different things and we should split this diacusion off to a
short term generic
timothyclarke opened a new issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.12
**Apache Airflow Provider versions** : not applicable - none / standard /
unknown (delete as applicable). I am installing the helm chart from this repo
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574#issuecomment-897557382
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17567#issuecomment-897601790
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
duc-luong-tnsl commented on issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568#issuecomment-897621824
I know how to fix it. But this exception makes the scheduler crashed
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
timothyclarke commented on issue #16013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16013#issuecomment-897626892
@XD-DENG When is `2.1.3` going to be released ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk opened a new pull request #17578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17578
When Group id of task group is used to prefix task id, it should
follow the same limitation that task_id has, plus it should not
have '.'. The '.' is used to separate groups in task id
so it
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 944dc32 Fix Invalid log order in ElasticsearchTaskHandler (#17551)
add 951006e Path correction in docs for
ryanahamilton closed pull request #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/464
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ryanahamilton opened a new pull request #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/464
This reverts commit 3cc2089e59754b4c51a6a5b3dd93b2286ae85dfb introduced in
#403.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17581#discussion_r687800528
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_local_task_job.py
##
@@ -273,42 +274,41 @@ def test_heartbeat_failed_fast(self):
delta = (time2 -
roestzwiee commented on issue #15340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15340#issuecomment-897729319
@autarchprinceps
I'm having the same trouble here. When deploying the chart to our local
machines all runs fine. But deploying the chart to our cluster using helm does
not
ashb commented on a change in pull request #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-ci-infra/pull/37#discussion_r687837943
##
File path: github-runner-ami/packer/ubuntu2004.pkr.hcl
##
@@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ variable "session_manager_instance_profile_name" {
}
source
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17546#issuecomment-896803730
Looking at the workaround, I don't think there is a `8.0.19` version of
mysql client for `buster` (debian10) debian. The last one I could find was
`8.0.20`
potiuk commented on issue #17546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17546#issuecomment-897735738
BTW. Thanks for the comment - corrected the "/usr" prefix in case someone
has similar problem :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rubenjv7 opened a new issue #17570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17570
**Apache Airflow version**:
**Apache Airflow Provider versions** (please include all providers that are
relevant to your bug):
**Kubernetes version (if you are
JavierLopezT opened a new issue #17571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17571
In the content menu, you can expand a section, but if you click again to
collapse, it does nothing
![Uploading Captura de pantalla 2021-08-12 a las 11.12.10.png…]()
--
This is an automated
JavierLopezT opened a new issue #17572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17572
In the web
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/howto/customize-dag-ui-page-instance-name.html
you can see
![Captura de pantalla 2021-08-12 a las 11 34
potiuk commented on issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568#issuecomment-897594350
You cannot use 'space' in task_id. Your task id is 'Create grafana
alert.alert_ESCALATION_AGING_FORWARD'. remove spaces and replace them with _
and it should start working fine.
potiuk closed issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568#issuecomment-897594350
You cannot use 'space' in task_id. Your task id is 'Create grafana
alert.alert_ESCALATION_AGING_FORWARD'. remove spaces and replace them with _
and it should start working
potiuk commented on issue #17566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17566#issuecomment-897460105
@pukaleashish -. I assume you are talking about Airflow images.
Your (quite rude and not something that is expected in our community to be
honest) request is invalid on many
potiuk closed issue #17566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17566
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dinigo commented on issue #13750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13750#issuecomment-897528058
WIP, have something, just struggling with the tests. I'll open it so we can
review "collectively"
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr commented on pull request #17544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17544#issuecomment-897538890
Writing a proper test turns out to be a long journey figuring out a right
combination to trigger this bug. So to trigger this bug, a DAG should _not_ be
in the DagBag, but
madhusudhan0542 opened a new issue #17573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17573
### Discussed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/17569
Originally posted by **madhusudhan0542** August 12, 2021
My intent is to create a Operator folder in dags
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17573#issuecomment-897549133
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17568#issuecomment-897594350
You cannot use 'space' in task_id. Your task id is 'Create grafana
alert.alert_ESCALATION_AGING_FORWARD'. remove spaces and replace them with _
and it should start working
bbovenzi commented on issue #17535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17535#issuecomment-897600625
> > Okay, I have drafted a PR.
Your changes are looking good. Care to open a full PR to review?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
kaxil commented on pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545#issuecomment-897600884
> can be known at the time of the DAG run whether or not to mark a task as
skipped.
That is not true in all cases though, DagRun creation does not mean your
Task will
kaxil commented on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-897602865
Failing on all Python 3.8 cases though?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
malthe opened a new pull request #17576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17576
This adds optional operator parameters `pre_execute` and `post_execute`,
both of which run synchronously immediately before and after task execution.
For example, this can be used to skip
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #16866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16866#discussion_r687488308
##
File path: airflow/example_dags/example_xcom.py
##
@@ -78,6 +104,14 @@ def puller(**kwargs):
pull = PythonOperator(
malthe commented on pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545#issuecomment-897477934
@potiuk it could be declarative as well; assuming that AIP-39 does not
exist, it could simply be a cron expression. If it matches the execution date
(or if the property is
uranusjr commented on issue #17566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17566#issuecomment-897523906
Airflow’s images are based on CPython’s builds
(https://hub.docker.com/_/python); `apache/airflow:2.1.2-python3.6`, for
example, is built against `python:3.6-slim-buster`. So if
malthe commented on pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545#issuecomment-897564521
@potiuk with AIP-39, won't the isolation change since the concrete timetable
implementation is now defined in DAG code? I'm not seeing anything about
decoupling the timetable
kaxil opened a new pull request #17575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17575
We only use `pandas` in `DbApiHook.get_pandas_df`. Not all users use it, plus
while `pandas` now supports many pre-compiled packages it still can take
forever where
it needs to be compiled.
malthe commented on pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545#issuecomment-897609829
I'll go ahead and close this pull request. The discussion can continue in
separate tracks – one for pre/post execute hooks and another for declarative
task scheduling
malthe closed pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
yevsh commented on issue #17395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17395#issuecomment-897611069
@ephraimbuddy thank you!
waiting with anticipation
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
JavierLopezT commented on pull request #17379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17379#issuecomment-897471707
> The mongo tests are failing
All green now :) I started using Breeze yesterday (finally) so that I don't
have these test failures in github
--
This is an
pukaleashish commented on issue #17566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17566#issuecomment-897502028
Thanks for sharing info.
I didnt mean to be rude here.
I was just asking the details when the slim buster would be updated to
latest version.
Anyways i will go
kaxil commented on pull request #17567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17567#issuecomment-897602069
Thanks @amit-talreja for catching this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
kaxil edited a comment on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-897602865
Failing on all Python 3.8 cases though, still unrelated to the change though
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
uranusjr closed issue #17572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17572
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on issue #17572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17572#issuecomment-897500718
Because the fix fa811057a6ae0fc6c5e4bff1e18971c262a42a4c happened after
2.1.2 was released, and we don’t go back and fix the 2.1.2 documentation.
Please wait for 2.1.3 and all
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574#issuecomment-897759148
> I am using an AWS RDS instance and so the CA certs SHOULD be in the OS by
default. If they are not then they are available in the AWS RDS PKI truststore.
This is
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574#issuecomment-897759148
> I am using an AWS RDS instance and so the CA certs SHOULD be in the OS by
default. If they are not then they are available in the AWS RDS PKI truststore.
This is
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574#issuecomment-897759148
> I am using an AWS RDS instance and so the CA certs SHOULD be in the OS by
default. If they are not then they are available in the AWS RDS PKI truststore.
This is
barun-mazumdar edited a comment on issue #17219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17219#issuecomment-897769421
It happening also on docker container from image: airflow 2.1.2, which I try
to run with default sqlite db of airflow. I just run the airflow db init,
airflow
potiuk commented on pull request #17575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17575#issuecomment-897788822
And it should work for old airflow versions as well. AFAIK when you specifiy
extra that is missing, it will be silently ignored, so it will work for pre 2.2
Airflow versions
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17584#issuecomment-897820987
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
aaronsteers opened a new issue #17584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17584
**Description**
It would be wonderful to not have to use a custom constraints file during
pip installs. My understanding is that these rules can be defined within
`pyproject.toml` and
kurtqq commented on pull request #16796:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16796#issuecomment-897852073
i guess pr is waiting for unit tests?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #17584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17584#issuecomment-897866259
Could you provide some references for this? Putting package metadata in
`pyproject.toml` ([PEP 621](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0621/)) is not
intended to replace
uranusjr commented on issue #17584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17584#issuecomment-897866259
Could you provide some references for this? Putting package metadata in
`pyproject.toml` ([PEP 621](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0621/)) is not
intended to replace
potiuk closed issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #17574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17574#issuecomment-897759148
This is postgres' requirement, not airflow's (And for a very good reason).
Postgres will never read from the certificate chain installed in the system for
a very good reason. What
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17580#issuecomment-89965
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #17580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17580#issuecomment-89421
Let's get it merged while I work on the other PR
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
potiuk closed issue #17570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17570
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ephraimbuddy merged pull request #17580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17580
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #17575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17575#issuecomment-897788822
And the Dockerfile will continue to work for old airflow versions as well.
AFAIK when you specifiy extra that is missing, it will be silently ignored, so
it will work
potiuk commented on pull request #17545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17545#issuecomment-897793611
> @potiuk with AIP-39, won't the isolation change since the concrete
timetable implementation is now defined in DAG code? I'm not seeing anything
about decoupling the
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
