boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17843#issuecomment-906105699
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
edctorr opened a new issue #17843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17843
Python version: 3.8.10
Airflow version: 2.1.3
Hello,
Whenever I try and delete a DAG, I receive a Traceback Error. I have tried
to change load_examples = False inside airflow.cfg and
anuj-condenast opened a new issue #17842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17842
**Description**
We all have faced issues with Airflow scheduling, where it schedules a DAG
at the end of the given schedule. We want a variable or config that could turn
that end
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17842#issuecomment-906101685
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
aprettyloner edited a comment on issue #10288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10288#issuecomment-906012109
My team is also seeing the deprecation warning for decorator in
`gcs_to_bigquery` on all `GCSToBigQueryOperator` imports. This is noisy and is
misleading some of our
aprettyloner edited a comment on issue #10288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10288#issuecomment-906012109
My team is also seeing the deprecation warning for decorator in
`gcs_to_bigquery` on all `GCSToBigQueryOperator` imports. This is noisy and
leads some of our
aprettyloner edited a comment on issue #10288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10288#issuecomment-906012109
My team is also seeing the deprecation warning for decorator in
`gcs_to_bigquery` on all `GCSToBigQueryOperator` imports. This is noisy as it
is not coming from our
aprettyloner edited a comment on issue #10288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10288#issuecomment-906012109
My team is also seeing the deprecation warning.
```
aprettyloner commented on issue #10288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10288#issuecomment-906012109
My team is also seeing the deprecation warning
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
andrewgodwin commented on issue #17834:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17834#issuecomment-906001148
It's not _quite_ that flexible sadly - Operators must have an async version
written along with an accompanying trigger, and since the trigger runs on a
different process it
bbenshalom opened a new pull request #17839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17839
Fixes #15888
The new endpoint will set the DAG run state and all of the task instances'
state to FAILED
I couldn't find any tests for the endpoints directly, so did not add a unit
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17839#issuecomment-905972040
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #17838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17838
Like we recently did for users with no roles, also handle it gracefully
when users have no permissions instead of letting them get stuck in a
redirect loop.
This also changes the
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #10606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10606
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #13853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13853#issuecomment-905956858
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 30 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new f8339ec Updating
jedcunningham commented on issue #17684:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17684#issuecomment-905944084
Thanks again for the report @kn6405, the fix will be in 2.2.0.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from ea49c96 Fix typos in docs & ``bug_report`` template (#17809)
add 7e93828 (docs): update README.md (#17806)
No
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17806#issuecomment-905929533
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
potiuk merged pull request #17806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17806
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17806#issuecomment-905929170
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 45e61a9 Only show import errors for DAGs a user can access (#17835)
add ea49c96 Fix typos in docs &
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17809#issuecomment-905928284
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
kaxil merged pull request #17809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17809
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17809#issuecomment-905928116
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 45e61a9 Only show import errors for DAGs a
kaxil merged pull request #17835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17835
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil closed issue #17684:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17684
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on issue #17836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17836#issuecomment-905916378
@fe2906 please open another issue with details if you found a bug. Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
jedcunningham closed issue #17836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17836
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
msolano00 edited a comment on issue #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16398#issuecomment-905896893
@ashb Hi, thanks you for reply and sorry for the late response, got pulled
into something at work.
Yes, exactly that is the behavior. Have a property that allows
msolano00 commented on issue #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16398#issuecomment-905896893
@ashb Hi, thanks you for reply!
Yes, exactly that is the behavior. Have a property that allows authenticated
users (like a service account) to run jobs as other users.
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17836#issuecomment-905887844
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
fe2906 opened a new issue #17836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17836
**Apache Airflow version**:
**OS**:
**Apache Airflow Provider versions**:
**Deployment**:
**What happened**:
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #17835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17835
We should only show import errors for DAGs that the user can access.
For new DAGs (ones that have not previously parsed successfully), import
errors will only be shown to users who can
mnojek commented on a change in pull request #17809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17809#discussion_r696084606
##
File path: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
##
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Please complete the next sections or the issue will be closed.
**OS**:
-
+
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #17745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17745#issuecomment-905837509
Yep. Because we stopped using it. I am just about to delete
`apache/airflow-ci` images because we switched to `ghcr.io` github images ~ 2
weeks ago and last week we
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17819#discussion_r696076214
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -207,17 +207,18 @@ def test_process_executor_events(self, mock_stats_incr,
potiuk commented on pull request #17745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17745#issuecomment-905837509
Yep. Because we stopped using it. I am just about to delete
`apache/airflow-ci' images because we switched to `ghcr.io` github images ~ 2
weeks ago and last week we disabled
potiuk closed issue #17834:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17834
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham closed pull request #17797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17797
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #17834:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17834#issuecomment-905831938
It's not supported because it has "callable" which cannot be serialised.
But FEAR NOUGHT ! @andrewgodwin is working on implementing AIP-40
jedcunningham closed pull request #17397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17397
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
atorres-eqrx commented on pull request #12809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12809#issuecomment-905821908
> > How does one know in which release of airflow this change has been
deployed?
> > I'm on airflow 1.10.15 and it seems that `headers` is not included in
eladkal commented on pull request #12809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12809#issuecomment-905815868
> How does one know in which release of airflow this change has been
deployed?
>
> I'm on airflow 1.10.15 and it seems that `headers` is not included in
jbsilva edited a comment on pull request #17745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17745#issuecomment-905808906
I read the 2.2.0 warning, but seems that the most recent image on Docker Hub
(_apache/airflow-ci:main-python3.9_) still does not have the _triggerer_
command:
jbsilva commented on pull request #17745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17745#issuecomment-905808906
I read the 2.2.0 warning, but seems that the most recent Docker Hub image
(_apache/airflow-ci:main-python3.9_) still does not have the _triggerer_
command:
`airflow
atorres-eqrx commented on pull request #12809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12809#issuecomment-905808828
How does one know in which release of airflow this change has been deployed?
I'm on airflow 1.10.15 and it seems that `headers` is not included in
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17819#discussion_r695882206
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -207,17 +207,18 @@ def test_process_executor_events(self, mock_stats_incr,
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 62166ec Updating
potiuk commented on issue #17833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17833#issuecomment-905773352
Nice one. @alwaysmpe - I can assign you this one.
You can make it in the way that it checks if "host" is in extra an uses it
from there if it's there (+raise a deprecation
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905761599
1. How do you set your broker variable ?
2. Can you show us result of `echo "'$(airflow config get-value celery
broker_url)'"` - i added ' to see the boundaries of what
potiuk commented on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905761599
1. How do you set your broker variable
2. Can you show us result of `echo "'$(airflow config get-value celery
broker_url)'"` - i added ' to see the boundaries of what it prints.
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905758371
BTW. The regexp pattern is correct .. It should nicely match the
`redis://redis-analytics-airflow.signal:6379/1`. I am just thinking maybe it's
about End-of-line or " "
cablespaghetti edited a comment on pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211#issuecomment-905692061
Ok hopefully I've done enough now. Also upgraded the default it tests
against to 1.22. Rerunning everything locally to check this hasn't broken
anything at the
potiuk commented on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905758371
BTW. The regexp pattern is correct .. It should nicely match the
`redis://redis-analytics-airflow.signal:6379/1`. I am just thinking maybe it's
about End-of-line returned by
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 96f7e3f Increase width for Run column (#17817)
add a759499 Update INTHEWILD.md (#17832)
No new revisions were
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17832#issuecomment-905751884
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
potiuk merged pull request #17832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17832
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jeffvswanson opened a new issue #17834:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17834
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.02
**OS**: Amazon Linux AMI
**Apache Airflow Provider versions**: apache-airflow-providers-amazon, v2.1.0
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17834:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17834#issuecomment-905751259
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on pull request #15177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15177#issuecomment-905751128
'And answering your other question @mm-lehmann - in case you have not
noticed the "import" command is counterpart of the "export" command
subkanthi commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-905734948
> LGTM and heppy to merge as soon as as you rebase @subkanthi - there were
some unrelated errors in main (fixed since then). Can you please rebase?
@potiuk , The docs
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905724680
Hm I somehow have a feeling (do no know yet) that it could be side-effect of
this change: which instead of reading the `__CELERY__` env variable, uses
`airflow get-value`:
potiuk edited a comment on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905724680
Hm I somehow have a feeling (do no know yet) that it could be side-effect of
this change: which instead of reading the `__CELERY__` env variable, uses
`airflow get config`:
potiuk commented on issue #17828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17828#issuecomment-905724680
Hm I somehow have a feeling (do no know yet) that it could be side-effect of
this change: which instead of running the `__CELERY__` env variable, uses
`airflow get config`:
alwaysmpe opened a new issue #17833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17833
**Apache Airflow version**:
Version: v2.1.2
Git Version: .release:2.1.2+d25854dd413aa68ea70fb1ade7fe01425f456192
**OS**:
PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)"
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17833#issuecomment-905723673
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
Jorricks commented on pull request #16634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16634#issuecomment-905710216
CI pipeline still not running..
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
cablespaghetti commented on a change in pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211#discussion_r695925270
##
File path: chart/values.yaml
##
@@ -120,24 +129,24 @@ ingress:
annotations: {}
# The path for the flower Ingress
-path: ""
+
cablespaghetti commented on pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211#issuecomment-905692061
Ok hopefully I've done enough now. Also upgraded the default it tests
against to 1.22. Rerunning everything locally to check this hasn't broken
anything at the moment.
cablespaghetti edited a comment on pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211#issuecomment-904661269
Really sorry this has taken so long, I have been super busy both at work and
outside. I will put in some time to try and get this done tomorrow.
--
This is an
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #15177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15177#issuecomment-905665622
If you really cared to ask this kind of question @MM-Lehmann, then I believe
because apparently you wanted to hear the answer rather than show your
superiority over
potiuk commented on pull request #15177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15177#issuecomment-905665622
If you really cared to ask this kind of question @MM-Lehmann, then I believe
because apparently you wanted to here the answer rather than show your
superiority over those who
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #17741:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17741#discussion_r695897882
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/operators/snowflake.py
##
@@ -125,3 +126,284 @@ def execute(self, context: Any) -> None:
if
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #17741:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17741#discussion_r695897882
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/operators/snowflake.py
##
@@ -125,3 +126,284 @@ def execute(self, context: Any) -> None:
if
KarthikRajashekaran closed issue #17831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17831
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #17797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17797#discussion_r695890136
##
File path: tests/task/task_runner/test_standard_task_runner.py
##
@@ -181,40 +179,40 @@ def test_on_kill(self):
except OSError:
jedcunningham commented on pull request #17797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17797#issuecomment-905641274
> Hmm one MSSQL test is failing with
I wasn't able to reproduce that locally, and with it being in
`test_scheduler_job.py` makes me suspicious it may simply be
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17819#discussion_r695882206
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -207,17 +207,18 @@ def test_process_executor_events(self, mock_stats_incr,
potiuk commented on issue #17827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17827#issuecomment-905622252
Siince the discussion is quite extensive there and there seem to be no
conclusion whether it is a configuration issue or a bug in Airflow..let's keep
it as discussion. There is no
potiuk closed issue #17827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17827
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
leahecole commented on pull request #17820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17820#issuecomment-905603682
Apologies - I'll fix the static checks later today. I also have a second
check I think i need to add to make sure you don't have both an initial node
count AND nodepools
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414#discussion_r695823577
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -92,11 +91,34 @@
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
-ScheduleInterval = Union[str, timedelta, relativedelta]
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414#discussion_r695821210
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -92,11 +91,34 @@
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
-ScheduleInterval = Union[str, timedelta, relativedelta]
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414#discussion_r695820908
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -92,11 +91,34 @@
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
-ScheduleInterval = Union[str, timedelta, relativedelta]
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17832#issuecomment-905549527
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
AliToro opened a new pull request #17832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17832
Add Tapsi to the list of Airflow users
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
KarthikRajashekaran opened a new issue #17831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17831
**Apache Airflow version**:
v2.0.2
**OS**:
MWAA
**Apache Airflow Provider versions**:
apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql==1.0.1
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17831#issuecomment-905544763
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
denimalpaca commented on a change in pull request #17741:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17741#discussion_r695794477
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/operators/snowflake.py
##
@@ -125,3 +126,299 @@ def execute(self, context: Any) -> None:
if
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #17819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17819#issuecomment-905524522
This is how to reproduce the error: Run this dag and assert that it's
successful. Then uncomment the `depend_on_past` arg so it's proper but
`depend_on_past` instead of
MM-Lehmann commented on pull request #15177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15177#issuecomment-905511912
How did this not get a documentation entry? Any definition of how the json
must look like? Even the sample.json mentioned in the tests is not in this PR,
is it?
--
This
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17819#discussion_r695735143
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -207,30 +207,32 @@ def test_process_executor_events(self, mock_stats_incr,
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #17819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17819#issuecomment-905475151
Hi @kaxil, what do you think about this implementation? still working on
tests...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ryanahamilton pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 06e53f2 Chart: configurable number of retention days for log groomers
(#17764)
add 96f7e3f Increase
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17817#issuecomment-905471630
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
ryanahamilton closed issue #17810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17810
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ryanahamilton merged pull request #17817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17817
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
eejbyfeldt commented on pull request #17821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17821#issuecomment-905421759
> Nice work! Could you provide steps on how to test the performance locally?
Yes, here is what i did:
In order to run the webserver locally I did the
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
