[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Imberman closed AIRFLOW-332.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Auto Closed
> Documentation says Sub-DAG names follow a convention, but in reality it's
> enforced
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-332
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-332
> Project: Apache Airflow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: operators
> Reporter: Jon McKenzie
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, the documentation states that a Sub-DAG's name should follow the
> convention {{<parent_dag_id>.<sub_dag_id>}}. In reality, this is not just a
> convention, but it is enforced, and a {{SubDagOperator}} will fail to load if
> its name is incorrect. The documentation should be updated to be a little
> clearer in this regard.
> Ideally, it would also be nice to either specify via an option that this
> validation should take place (or not), or be easier to subclass
> {{SubDagOperator}} and override the validation, so that users can have their
> own naming conventions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
