[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16623884#comment-16623884
]
Henning Rohde commented on BEAM-2880:
-------------------------------------
Based on the portable Flink runner work, it seems these proxies are not the
direction that we want to go. I'll close the this issue and remove the (unused)
sketch code. We can always revive that path later.
> Artifact server proxies
> -----------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-2880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2880
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: beam-model
> Reporter: Henning Rohde
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: portability
>
> As per https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api-container-contract, we should add
> runner-agnostic (dockerized) artifact proxies for various runner
> environments. These proxies implement the server side of the artifact API.
> We'll likely need proxies for GCS, S3, Azure Storage, and local. If the
> proxies are implemented in a statically-linked language like Go, say, then
> they do not have a dependency footprint and can easily be used as native
> binaries or in dockerized form -- at the discretion of the runner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
