[jira] [Commented] (BEAM-260) Know the getSideInputWindow upper bound so can gc side input state

2016-09-17 Thread Aljoscha Krettek (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498458#comment-15498458
 ] 

Aljoscha Krettek commented on BEAM-260:
---

The doc looks good, I'm not sure how many people will see this comment on a 
Jira issue so it might make sense to [POPOSE] it on the ML.

> Know the getSideInputWindow upper bound so can gc side input state
> --
>
> Key: BEAM-260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-260
> Project: Beam
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: beam-model
>Reporter: Mark Shields
>Assignee: Kenneth Knowles
>
> We currently have no static knowledge about the getSideInputWindow function, 
> and runners are thus forced to hold on to all side input state / elements in 
> case a future element reaches back into an earlier side input element.
> Maybe we need an upper bound on lag from current to result of 
> getSideInputWindow so we can have a progressing gc horizon as we do for  GKB 
> window state. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (BEAM-260) Know the getSideInputWindow upper bound so can gc side input state

2016-09-15 Thread Kenneth Knowles (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15494237#comment-15494237
 ] 

Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-260:
--

This came up again on the dev list in [this 
thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCA%2B5xAo0JXSufSTSpa1cQ-yUU%3DgKnTK84HjBqWWL8T3NpiRpbOA%40mail.gmail.com%3E]
 by [~thw]. I have a simple proposed solution at 
https://s.apache.org/beam-windowmappingfn-1-pager. It is small, but may just be 
large enough to merit a \[PROPOSAL\] thread on the mailing list or a "BIP" if 
we ever keep a separate catalog of those.

> Know the getSideInputWindow upper bound so can gc side input state
> --
>
> Key: BEAM-260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-260
> Project: Beam
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: beam-model
>Reporter: Mark Shields
>Assignee: Kenneth Knowles
>
> We currently have no static knowledge about the getSideInputWindow function, 
> and runners are thus forced to hold on to all side input state / elements in 
> case a future element reaches back into an earlier side input element.
> Maybe we need an upper bound on lag from current to result of 
> getSideInputWindow so we can have a progressing gc horizon as we do for  GKB 
> window state. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (BEAM-260) Know the getSideInputWindow upper bound so can gc side input state

2016-05-07 Thread Aljoscha Krettek (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15275128#comment-15275128
 ] 

Aljoscha Krettek commented on BEAM-260:
---

I thought about this as well while working on the Flink Streaming side input 
support. Could it be enough to have something like 
{{WindowFn.getSideInputCleanupTime(BoundedWindow)}} that tells you when you can 
GC a side input window based on the main-input watermark. This would be called 
on the WindowFn of the side input, since it knows how the main-input windows 
are mapped to side inputs.

> Know the getSideInputWindow upper bound so can gc side input state
> --
>
> Key: BEAM-260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-260
> Project: Beam
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: beam-model
>Reporter: Mark Shields
>Assignee: Frances Perry
>
> We currently have no static knowledge about the getSideInputWindow function, 
> and runners are thus forced to hold on to all side input state / elements in 
> case a future element reaches back into an earlier side input element.
> Maybe we need an upper bound on lag from current to result of 
> getSideInputWindow so we can have a progressing gc horizon as we do for  GKB 
> window state. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)