Re: [PR] [WIP] Bump jetcd from 0.7.7 to 0.8.0 [bookkeeper]

shoothzj commented on PR #4368: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4368#issuecomment-2131236475 @lhotari BookKeeper's client and server in one module and the fat client makes thing complicated. I would like to separate client and server module first. But the client module will s

Re: [PR] [WIP] Bump jetcd from 0.7.7 to 0.8.0 [bookkeeper]

shoothzj closed pull request #4368: [WIP] Bump jetcd from 0.7.7 to 0.8.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4368 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [PR] [WIP] Bump jetcd from 0.7.7 to 0.8.0 [bookkeeper]

lhotari commented on PR #4368: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4368#issuecomment-2115078748 > @lhotari jetcd 0.8.0 required jdk11, I think we need to do more jobs. I would convert this pr to draft first Do we have plans to bump minimum jdk version requirement in Bookkee

Re: [PR] [WIP] Bump jetcd from 0.7.7 to 0.8.0 [bookkeeper]

shoothzj commented on PR #4368: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4368#issuecomment-2115026985 @lhotari jetcd 0.8.0 required jdk11, I think we need to do more jobs. I would convert this pr to draft first -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond