astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-787751588
I think it's been superseded by #2048. Feel free to re-open if that is not
the case.
This is an automated
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-763896401
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-764797344
@doru1004 thanks, that looks good to me from an end-user standpoint.
From the implementation, I would suggest to try reusing the builder API for
local operations as
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-764637916
@doru1004 may be worth you having a look at #1816.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-764488173
@doru1004 thanks, it seems you're a lot more capable than me to formalise
what's in my mind !
This is an
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-763896401
Damn, I'm not sure what's going on in my brain, but it seems it cannot get
that `kamel inspect` does not retrieve details about the Integration resource
from the cluster
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-763853474
@nicolaferraro what do you think about grouping all the _local-related_
operations into the `local` parent command?
I see the downloading of dependencies as an
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-738083443
Ah right. For some reasons I thought the `inspect` sub-command could also
take an integration name.
Out of curiosity, is the `inspect` sub-command meant to have a
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-737734726
@doru1004 thanks. As this performs a local build, I suggest to move the
logic in the `local` subcommand. I think the later is better suited to group
all the subcommands
astefanutti commented on pull request #1816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/1816#issuecomment-732736420
Could you please explicit the use cases you have in mind that would leverage
this?
I'm wondering whether the `kamel inspect integration` is the right host for
this
10 matches
Mail list logo
