ppalaga commented on PR #5117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5117#issuecomment-1690280718
@claudio4j in https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5219 I have
rebased on top of recent main and I have put a few enhancements on top of the
current PR. Please review there
ppalaga commented on PR #5117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5117#issuecomment-1688379633
> In camel-k-runtime repository, these tests are IT enabled.
ppalaga commented on PR #5117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5117#issuecomment-1688210157
> I am still looking whether we could merge the ITs into fewer Maven modules
to save some time on the CI.
Now I see that `camel-k-loader` does not have any assertions for
ppalaga commented on PR #5117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5117#issuecomment-1688162593
Thanks @claudio4j, I have done another round of review. I have send a PR
against your PR https://github.com/claudio4j/camel-quarkus/pull/1 with some
minor fixes. Please feel free
ppalaga commented on PR #5117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5117#issuecomment-1670097150
We had a chat with @claudio4j and we agreed to work towards the following
(@jamesnetherton and others please speak up if you do not like something):
1. The BOM currently in
ppalaga commented on PR #5117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/5117#issuecomment-1669388263
looks scarry, but I will have a look later today
--
This is an
