squakez merged PR #4917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4917
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rinaldodev commented on PR #4917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4917#issuecomment-1817116312
> Thanks, I will. Some of the tests are flaky and I'm trying to figure out
why.
Some of the original tests are flaky because sometimes routes are considered
UP for a while
rinaldodev commented on PR #4917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4917#issuecomment-1811428155
> Feel free to move the PR to ready to review or add a comment when you are
okey to merge it.
Thanks, I will. Some of the tests are flaky and I'm trying to figure out why.
--
squakez commented on PR #4917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4917#issuecomment-1810229208
Feel free to move the PR to ready to review or add a comment when you are
okey to merge it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
squakez commented on PR #4917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4917#issuecomment-1808045568
> @squakez I was considering adding tests for more scenarios. Do you think
its worth it?
The more scenario we cover the better. However, for the specific issue I
think it should
rinaldodev commented on PR #4917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4917#issuecomment-1808037160
@squakez I was considering adding tests for more scenarios. Do you think its
worth it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
