[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15267232#comment-15267232 ] Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-11514: - What are we measuring here? Write performance or compaction performance? The graph looks like it is write perf? > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15262168#comment-15262168 ] Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-11514: -- What is the test run by {{daily_regressions_trunk-compaction_lcs}} so someone else can try to reproduce/have a look at it? > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15260406#comment-15260406 ] Michael Shuler commented on CASSANDRA-11514: I was unable to find a concrete method to bisect this - I attempted a good number of variations to find a way to call a commit "good" or "bad", but was unsuccessful. Those are on a private jira [CSTAR-478|https://datastax.jira.com/browse/CSTAR-478], which I'm going to close, since I'm currently unsure of how to proceed. > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15230918#comment-15230918 ] Michael Shuler commented on CASSANDRA-11514: Larger run on DTCS [trunk_3.5_3.0-compaction_DTCS|http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/artifacts/c9dd18fc-fcd7-11e5-8f8b-0256e416528f/graph] seems to support that trunk and 3.5 both have this commit. The differences seem pretty small, so it could be difficult to determine a difference between 2 commits. > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15230795#comment-15230795 ] Michael Shuler commented on CASSANDRA-11514: Bumped up from 10M to 25M writes/reads and this round on [trunk_3.5_3.0-compaction_LCS|http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/artifacts/aa6dee6a-fcd7-11e5-8f8b-0256e416528f/graph] looks like 3.5 is pretty evenly split performance-wise between 3.0 and trunk. (Waiting on DTCS to finish) > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15230421#comment-15230421 ] Michael Shuler commented on CASSANDRA-11514: [trunk_3.5_3.0-compaction_LCS|http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/artifacts/7b642270-fccc-11e5-bf65-0256e416528f/graph] shows that both trunk and 3.5 seem to have the same issue. 'op rate' text and 'Total operations' graph seem to agree. [trunk_3.5_3.0-compaction_DTCS|http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/artifacts/2aace7d6-fccc-11e5-bf65-0256e416528f/graph] is less conclusive. I'm going to run both for a longer period and write more data to see if I can get a little more definitive answer. > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15230323#comment-15230323 ] Michael Shuler commented on CASSANDRA-11514: I'm starting some perf runs to see if a) is this commit in the 3.5 release HEAD, comparing with trunk and 3.0 HEAD, then b) see if I can determine the commit culprit. > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15228948#comment-15228948 ] Michael Shuler commented on CASSANDRA-11514: Automatically on cstar_perf, unfortunately not. It may be possible feeding jobs with git sha's. > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11514) trunk compaction performance regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15228935#comment-15228935 ] Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-11514: -- Would it be possible to bisect the culprit? > trunk compaction performance regression > --- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11514 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11514 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Compaction > Environment: cstar_perf >Reporter: Michael Shuler > Labels: performance > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png, > trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png > > > It appears that a commit between Mar 29-30 has resulted in a drop in > compaction performance. I attempted to get a log list of commits to post > here, but > {noformat} > git log trunk@{2016-03-29}..trunk@{2016-03-31} > {noformat} > appears to be incomplete, since reading through {{git log}} I see netty and > och were upgraded during this time period. > !trunk-compaction_dtcs-op_rate.png! > !trunk-compaction_lcs-op_rate.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)