Michael Krumpholz created CASSANDRA-4628:
--------------------------------------------

             Summary: CQL/JDBC: date vs. timestamp issues
                 Key: CASSANDRA-4628
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4628
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 1.1.4
            Reporter: Michael Krumpholz
            Priority: Critical


Cassandra's datatypes only have one Date/Time type named timestamp containing 
both date and time. Calling the validator 
org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.DateType might be OK in general but can be 
confusing in the jdbc context where there is a distinction between date, time 
and timestamp. In terms of jdbc there should be more datatypes for dates and 
times or the jdbc driver should take one of the following options:
- stick to timestamp
- check if the date has a time part and distinguish by the data between date 
and timestamp automatically
- use distinct datatypes according to the jdbc spec, the types would need to be 
in cassandra then too

Now back to my actual problem:
org.apache.cassandra.cql.jdbc.JdbcDate returns Types.DATE in getType(). Even if 
having inserted a complete date with time (making it a timestamp) the 
ResultSetMetaData.getColumnType() implementation still returns Types.DATE 
(source of this is in JdbcDate). If some other java code (where i don't have 
access to) uses the metadata to get the type and then getDate() to get the 
value the time is cut off the value and only the date is returned.

But the ResultSet.getObject() implementation returns a complete java.util.Date 
including the time.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to