[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Stupp updated CASSANDRA-7423: Status: Resolved (was: Open) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Legacy/CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs >Priority: Normal > Labels: LWT, client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.6 > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anonymous updated CASSANDRA-7423: - Status: Open (was: Resolved) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Legacy/CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs >Priority: Normal > Labels: LWT, client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.6 > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hanna updated CASSANDRA-7423: Labels: LWT client-impacting cql docs-impacting (was: client-impacting cql docs-impacting) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs >Priority: Major > Labels: LWT, client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.6 > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tyler Hobbs updated CASSANDRA-7423:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Ready to Commit)
Thanks, committed to trunk as {{677230df694752c7ecf6d5459eee60ad7cf45ecf}}.
> Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
> --
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7423
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: CQL
>Reporter: Tupshin Harper
>Assignee: Tyler Hobbs
> Labels: client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting
> Fix For: 3.6
>
>
> Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you
> have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they
> can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a
> subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative
> for the entire blob.
> When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting),
> this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal
> situation.
> The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or
> consistency or both.
> edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be
> considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to
> individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW
> semantics
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin Lerer updated CASSANDRA-7423: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.x) 3.6 > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Labels: client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.6 > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin Lerer updated CASSANDRA-7423: -- Status: Ready to Commit (was: Patch Available) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Labels: client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.6 > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tyler Hobbs updated CASSANDRA-7423: --- Reviewer: Benjamin Lerer Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Labels: client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.x > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tyler Hobbs updated CASSANDRA-7423:
---
Labels: client-impacting cql docs-impacting (was: cql docs-impacting)
Tagging this client-impacting because drivers might be unconditionally wrapping
UDTs in {{frozen<>}}.
> Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
> --
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7423
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: CQL
>Reporter: Tupshin Harper
>Assignee: Tyler Hobbs
> Labels: client-impacting, cql, docs-impacting
> Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you
> have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they
> can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a
> subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative
> for the entire blob.
> When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting),
> this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal
> situation.
> The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or
> consistency or both.
> edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be
> considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to
> individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW
> semantics
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tyler Hobbs updated CASSANDRA-7423: --- Since Version: (was: 2.1 beta1) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Labels: cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.x > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tyler Hobbs updated CASSANDRA-7423: --- Labels: cql docs-impacting (was: cql) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Labels: cql, docs-impacting > Fix For: 3.x > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joshua McKenzie updated CASSANDRA-7423: --- Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: CQL >Reporter: Tupshin Harper >Assignee: Tyler Hobbs > Labels: cql > Fix For: 3.x > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sylvain Lebresne updated CASSANDRA-7423: Assignee: (was: Benjamin Lerer) > Allow updating individual subfields of UDT > -- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: API, Core >Reporter: Tupshin Harper > Labels: cql > Fix For: 3.x > > > Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you > have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they > can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a > subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative > for the entire blob. > When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), > this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal > situation. > The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or > consistency or both. > edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be > considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to > individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW > semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-7423: -- Assignee: Benjamin Lerer Allow updating individual subfields of UDT -- Key: CASSANDRA-7423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 Project: Cassandra Issue Type: Improvement Components: API, Core Reporter: Tupshin Harper Assignee: Benjamin Lerer Labels: cql Fix For: 3.x Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative for the entire blob. When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal situation. The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or consistency or both. edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tyler Hobbs updated CASSANDRA-7423: --- Assignee: (was: Tyler Hobbs) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT -- Key: CASSANDRA-7423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 Project: Cassandra Issue Type: Improvement Components: API, Core Reporter: Tupshin Harper Labels: cql Fix For: 3.x Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative for the entire blob. When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal situation. The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or consistency or both. edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Thompson updated CASSANDRA-7423: --- Tester: Philip Thompson Fix Version/s: 3.0 Allow updating individual subfields of UDT -- Key: CASSANDRA-7423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 Project: Cassandra Issue Type: Improvement Components: API, Core Reporter: Tupshin Harper Labels: cql Fix For: 3.0 Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative for the entire blob. When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal situation. The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or consistency or both. edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-7423) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-7423: -- Summary: Allow updating individual subfields of UDT (was: make user defined types useful for non-trivial use cases) Allow updating individual subfields of UDT -- Key: CASSANDRA-7423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7423 Project: Cassandra Issue Type: Improvement Components: API, Core Reporter: Tupshin Harper Labels: cql Since user defined types were implemented in CASSANDRA-5590 as blobs (you have to rewrite the entire type in order to make any modifications), they can't be safely used without LWT for any operation that wants to modify a subset of the UDT's fields by any client process that is not authoritative for the entire blob. When trying to use UDTs to model complex records (particularly with nesting), this is not an exceptional circumstance, this is the totally expected normal situation. The use of UDTs for anything non-trivial is harmful to either performance or consistency or both. edit: to clarify, i believe that most potential uses of UDTs should be considered anti-patterns until/unless we have field-level r/w access to individual elements of the UDT, with individual timestamps and standard LWW semantics -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
