[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2023-01-23 Thread via GitHub
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-1400793602 @DaanHoogland I opened a new Issue for that topic - I hope it was the right format https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7126 -- This is an automated message

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2023-01-20 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-1398642903 Regarding the 'uefi.properties' file i guess everything is said and done. As always it would be nice to see some more information in the docs for this as the only offical

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2022-08-17 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-1218556110 > I think the creation depends on whether the hypervisor supports it; for ex. if the platform is arm64, all VMs are UEFI based only; is this still a bug @gaaray2k ?

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2021-10-07 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-937332960 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2021-10-07 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-937844036 @DaanHoogland sorry - ideas / knowledge on the following: > But found that during migration with both cases - migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume and

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2021-10-07 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-937646414 So then as an update: migrating UEFI secureboot enabled instances on kvm works: with NFS: - in stopped state - in running state --> Basically fully

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2021-10-06 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-937332960 @slavkap Thank you for your effort! Really usefull informations. So when i got everythig correctly, migrating UEFI secureboot enabled instances on kvm should work:

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2021-10-04 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-933944893 That would be really appreaciated. Currently the docs as well as the wiki are quiet ... empty regarding this whole topic. -- This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [cloudstack] Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: uefi vm creation fail

2021-10-04 Thread GitBox
Hudratronium commented on issue #4238: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4238#issuecomment-933350099 > > > @slavkap , that sounds like the adding of uefi.properties should be part of the agent setup/host connect procedure, should it? cc @weizhouapache @wido