git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix internal version numbers

2013-09-23 Thread jmclean
Updated Branches: refs/heads/develop d8fdfb53a - b32da1e51 Fix internal version numbers Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/commit/b32da1e5 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/tree/b32da1e5

git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33713: An NPE is thrown by this code when compiling 'spark.swc' from the SDK. The null check bypasses the issue, it doesn't do anything to fix the

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
Updated Branches: refs/heads/develop f7956f9a4 - 78cbff9f0 FLEX-33713: An NPE is thrown by this code when compiling 'spark.swc' from the SDK. The null check bypasses the issue, it doesn't do anything to fix the root cause... Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project:

[1/3] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33310: disable 'duplicate skin state' warning.

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
Updated Branches: refs/heads/develop 78cbff9f0 - 5abe3d03d FLEX-33310: disable 'duplicate skin state' warning. Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit:

[3/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33307: fix missing import statements - missing according to Falcon, not the old compiler. Not sure if this is a valid difference between the ol

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
FLEX-33307: fix missing import statements - missing according to Falcon, not the old compiler. Not sure if this is a valid difference between the old compiler and Falcon, or if I'm just working around an issue that needs fixin' Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project:

[4/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33307: fix another couple of 'variable definition duplicates function parameter' warnings.

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
FLEX-33307: fix another couple of 'variable definition duplicates function parameter' warnings. Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/commit/633f5253 Tree:

[2/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33731: solves 'access of possibly undefined property' that pops up when trying to compile 'experimental.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this is a

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
FLEX-33731: solves 'access of possibly undefined property' that pops up when trying to compile 'experimental.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this is a valid difference between the old compiler and Falcon, or if I'm just working around an issue that needs fixin' Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin

[1/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33731: solves 'definition not found' issue that pops up when trying to compile 'experimental.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this is a valid diff

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
Updated Branches: refs/heads/develop b32da1e51 - 82fb7f8bd FLEX-33731: solves 'definition not found' issue that pops up when trying to compile 'experimental.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this is a valid difference between the old compiler and Falcon, or if I'm just working around an issue

[5/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33307: solves a kazillion issues with MXFTETextInput that pop up when trying to compile 'spark.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this is a valid di

2013-09-23 Thread erikdebruin
FLEX-33307: solves a kazillion issues with MXFTETextInput that pop up when trying to compile 'spark.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this is a valid difference between the old compiler and Falcon, or if I'm just working around an issue that needs fixin' Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin

Jenkins build became unstable: flex-flexunit #143

2013-09-23 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-flexunit/143/

Re: git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33307: adding these arguments makes most of the warnings and some of the errors go away. Baby steps ; -)

2013-09-23 Thread Alex Harui
Nevermind, I guess you need to do that for the AIR-related SWCs? -Alex On 9/23/13 9:51 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: I believe that we normally compile the framework against flex-config.xml not air-config.xml. Is there a reason you chose air-config? -Alex On 9/23/13 7:31 AM,

Re: git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33307: adding these arguments makes most of the warnings and some of the errors go away. Baby steps ; -)

2013-09-23 Thread Alex Harui
I believe that we normally compile the framework against flex-config.xml not air-config.xml. Is there a reason you chose air-config? -Alex On 9/23/13 7:31 AM, erikdebr...@apache.org erikdebr...@apache.org wrote: Updated Branches: refs/heads/develop 5abe3d03d - 05cfdcb68 FLEX-33307: adding

Re: [2/5] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33731: solves 'access of possibly undefined property' that pops up when trying to compile 'experimental.swc' with Falcon. Not sure if this

2013-09-23 Thread Erik de Bruin
I guess that's up to Tink to explain. All I know is that those 2 lines after the we giving Falcon grief because that variable and method don't seem to be declared anywhere I could easily find and since the code won't execute in a meaningful way I figured commenting it out was the fastest route to

Build failed in Jenkins: flex-flexunit #145

2013-09-23 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-flexunit/145/ -- [...truncated 1422 lines...] [flexunit] Suite: org.hamcrest.filter.FilterFunctionTest [flexunit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec [flexunit] Suite:

Jenkins build is back to stable : flex-flexunit #144

2013-09-23 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-flexunit/144/

Re: git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-33713: An NPE is thrown by this code when compiling 'spark.swc' from the SDK. The null check bypasses the issue, it doesn't do anything to fix

2013-09-23 Thread Alex Harui
Hmm. Seems like methodBodyVisitor is needed to complete the codegen for the static initializer. Instead of a null check, a call to getMethodBodyVisitor() might be the right answer, but a simple test case that verifies correct codegen would be helpful. There might be something unique to