umehrot2 commented on issue #770: remove com.databricks:spark-avro to build
spark avro schema by itself
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/770#issuecomment-532810711
> @umehrot2 I think balaji has his hands full with the release atm. Do you
have bandwidth to try moving to
umehrot2 commented on issue #770: remove com.databricks:spark-avro to build
spark avro schema by itself
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/770#issuecomment-532808342
@vinothchandar At EMR we do not have a use-case to support Spark 2.3 or
earlier. We would be offering Hudi
umehrot2 commented on issue #770: remove com.databricks:spark-avro to build
spark avro schema by itself
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/770#issuecomment-532475222
@vinothchandar At the moment, I cannot think of a good way how we can
upgrade avro version while still
umehrot2 commented on issue #770: remove com.databricks:spark-avro to build
spark avro schema by itself
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/770#issuecomment-532354352
@vinothchandar @cdmikechen
I was able to read and write `Decimal` type correctly by upgrading that
umehrot2 commented on issue #770: remove com.databricks:spark-avro to build
spark avro schema by itself
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/770#issuecomment-532026904
> @umehrot2 Great analysis.. Would upgrading parquet-avro help?
Good point @vinothchandar . Upon a
umehrot2 commented on issue #770: remove com.databricks:spark-avro to build
spark avro schema by itself
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/770#issuecomment-532014549
> should we first rebase and resolve the conflicts?
For my testing, I had re-based this PR on top of