szha commented on issue #18751:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18751#issuecomment-660421440
@gilbertfrancois thanks for the report. Does it also happen with the 2.0 on
master branch? You can install mxnet-cu102 v2.0.0b20200716 from
https://dist.mxnet.io/python
szha commented on a change in pull request #18748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18748#discussion_r456745543
##
File path: docs/python_docs/python/api/gluon/metric/index.rst
##
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+.. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
szha commented on pull request #18721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18721#issuecomment-660420287
Developers may still need to rely on some of the Makefile targets for
development purpose. Make sure that they are documented prominently, as we
can't ask developers to
szha commented on pull request #18749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18749#issuecomment-660419990
Also, I'd like to see backend serialization/deserialization happen since it
likely will be needed. If we merge this for python only first and there's any
issue in adding
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18721#issuecomment-660418477
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [edge, sanity, unix-cpu, miscellaneous,
unix-gpu, centos-gpu, windows-cpu, clang, website, centos-cpu, windows-gpu]
leezu commented on pull request #18721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18721#issuecomment-660418464
@mxnet-bot run ci [all]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18748#issuecomment-660418433
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [edge, sanity, unix-cpu, miscellaneous,
unix-gpu, centos-gpu, windows-cpu, clang, website, centos-cpu, windows-gpu]
leezu commented on pull request #18748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18748#issuecomment-660418425
@mxnet-bot run ci [all]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dickjc123 pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 444a7ee Revert "Add qr backward
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dickjc123 pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 444a7ee Revert "Add qr backward
DickJC123 merged pull request #18750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18750
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
Kh4L commented on a change in pull request #18749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18749#discussion_r456731407
##
File path: python/mxnet/gluon/block.py
##
@@ -336,41 +337,43 @@ def _collect_params_with_prefix(self, prefix='',
select=None):
leezu commented on pull request #18750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18750#issuecomment-660399925
@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18750#issuecomment-660399950
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-cpu]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
aaronmarkham pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet-site.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new f392469 Bump the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
aaronmarkham pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet-site.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new 289ba46 Publish
ksindwan commented on issue #14387:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14387#issuecomment-660392074
Facing the same issue
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
gilbertfrancois commented on issue #18100:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18100#issuecomment-660388871
Could the failing `test_operator.py::test_batchnorm` be related to issue
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18751 ?
DickJC123 opened a new issue #18753:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18753
## Description
Could our system be changed to prevent merging of a CI-passing PR after a
"merge window" has elapsed? I guess this is not normally a problem since after
a time an auto-merge
access2rohit commented on pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752#issuecomment-660388094
@josephevans Thanks for contribution to Large Tensor Support project. Also
paste the output of your test runs as a comment or in the description in the PR.
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752#discussion_r456721056
##
File path: src/operator/tensor/la_op-inl.h
##
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ using namespace mshadow;
// Copies lower/upper triangular part to
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752#discussion_r456721056
##
File path: src/operator/tensor/la_op-inl.h
##
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ using namespace mshadow;
// Copies lower/upper triangular part to
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752#discussion_r456721100
##
File path: src/operator/tensor/la_op-inl.h
##
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ using namespace mshadow;
// Copies lower/upper triangular part to
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752#discussion_r456721100
##
File path: src/operator/tensor/la_op-inl.h
##
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ using namespace mshadow;
// Copies lower/upper triangular part to
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752#issuecomment-660387316
Hey @josephevans , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one
or more tests again with the
josephevans opened a new pull request #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18752
## Description ##
Fix linalg_potri operator when using large tensor size.
Unit tests to come.
This is an
gilbertfrancois opened a new issue #18751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18751
## Description
The implementation of `gluon.nn.BatchNorm` behaves different on CPU and GPU
context. I suspect that during the update of running_mean and running_var, the
updated
ys2843 edited a comment on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660381271
> Not sure, but this didn't work:
http://ec2-34-219-134-42.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/contribute.html
> Shouldn't the dropdown read 1.6 if the
ys2843 edited a comment on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660381271
> Not sure, but this didn't work:
http://ec2-34-219-134-42.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/contribute.html
> Shouldn't the dropdown read 1.6 if the
ys2843 commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660382958
> > Yes, my plan is to copy the get_started.html directly from master branch
to v1.6 static artifact (maybe need some change in the header)
>
> Thank you. Do you
ys2843 edited a comment on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660381271
> Not sure, but this didn't work:
http://ec2-34-219-134-42.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/contribute.html
> Shouldn't the dropdown read 1.6 if the
ys2843 edited a comment on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660381271
> Not sure, but this didn't work:
http://ec2-34-219-134-42.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/contribute.html
> Shouldn't the dropdown read 1.6 if the
ys2843 commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660381271
> Not sure, but this didn't work:
http://ec2-34-219-134-42.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/contribute.html
> Shouldn't the dropdown read 1.6 if the
leezu commented on pull request #18750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18750#issuecomment-660381244
@hzfan please don't merge PRs without verifying that the last CI run is
recent. In this case you merged a PR where the CI has not verified it for
multiple months.
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18750#issuecomment-660380906
Hey @leezu , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one
or more tests again with the following
leezu opened a new pull request #18750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18750
Reverts apache/incubator-mxnet#18197 as test_np_linalg_qr does not pass and
it blocks all development.
@D-Roberts feel free to submit a fix if you have one ready; alternatively I
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a commit to branch revert-18197-qr_back_two
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git
commit bd52fb75af3406e7618440fc39d44c7ceca62bf9
Author: Leonard Lausen
AuthorDate: Fri Jul 17
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a change to branch revert-18197-qr_back_two
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git.
at bd52fb7 Revert "Add qr backward for wide matrices with m < n (#18197)"
This branch
leezu commented on pull request #18749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18749#issuecomment-660379339
@ZheyuYe please verify if this addresses
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18717
This
leezu opened a new pull request #18749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18749
Switch to npz serialization format
https://numpy.org/devdocs/reference/generated/numpy.lib.format.html
At this point in time, only Python bindings exist and no functionality is
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18749#issuecomment-660379004
Hey @leezu , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one
or more tests again with the following
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a change to branch leezu-patch-3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git.
discard 33698e4 Update index.rst
add 620e070 Fix metric API page
This update added new revisions
leezu commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660377875
> Yes, my plan is to copy the get_started.html directly from master branch
to v1.6 static artifact (maybe need some change in the header)
Thank you. Do you mean
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a change to branch leezu-patch-3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git.
discard 33698e4 Update index.rst
add 620e070 Fix metric API page
This update added new revisions
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a change to branch leezu-patch-3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git.
discard 33698e4 Update index.rst
add 620e070 Fix metric API page
This update added new revisions
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a change to branch leezu-patch-3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git.
at 33698e4 Update index.rst
No new revisions were added by this update.
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18748#issuecomment-660376897
Hey @leezu , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one
or more tests again with the following
DickJC123 opened a new issue #18747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18747
## Description
This is a problem I ran into in the development of PR
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18694, and **I have include a
fix** in commit
aaronmarkham commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660376969
Not sure, but this didn't work:
http://ec2-34-219-134-42.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/community/contribute.html
Shouldn't the dropdown read 1.6 if the
leezu opened a new pull request #18748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18748
Fixup
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/cec86add654fccda2f2112d4487738854e7663ca
This is an automated message
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a commit to branch leezu-patch-3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git
commit 33698e429d8bb10058c5ab96bfc0c7fb0dcb8d82
Author: Leonard Lausen
AuthorDate: Fri Jul 17 16:15:17 2020
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lausen pushed a change to branch leezu-patch-3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mxnet.git.
at 33698e4 Update index.rst
This branch includes the following new commits:
new 33698e4 Update
ys2843 commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660372395
> Instead of just testing redirects on the contribute page in the preview,
shouldn't we be testing redirects across all pages?
This PR is to ensure the redirect
ys2843 commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660371019
> If `/versions/1.6/get_started` becomes the default, we need to backport
the license fixes to that page. Is it possible? Or do we require using the 1.x
branch given
szha commented on pull request #18574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18574#issuecomment-660367098
cc @leezu on the build.
I think the tests were removed as we are deprecating NDArray in 2.0 and
there's additional work needed for supporting numpy operator for
leezu opened a new issue #17810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17810
## Description
There seem to be some issues with GraphExecutor + Numpy + Dynamic shape.
Consider the example below, which leads to a crash if `mx.npx.set_np()` is
present and works fine if
szha commented on issue #17810:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17810#issuecomment-660366181
This is still a valid combination on 1.7
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Kh4L commented on pull request #18574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18574#issuecomment-660354283
> Thanks, Serge. How is this tested at the moment?
It was supposed to be tested in the tensorrt tests deleted here in this PR
MoisesHer commented on pull request #18608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18608#issuecomment-660351179
> Hi @ChaiBapchya , I took a look at the failure of [unix-gpu] which showed
TVM compilation error and GPU OOM runtime error, seems it's more like the CI
side issue.
leezu opened a new issue #18746:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18746
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/cec86add654fccda2f2112d4487738854e7663ca/python/mxnet/numpy/multiarray.py#L332-L365
Will fail in line 359 if `out is None`.
Example
leezu commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660339978
If `/versions/1.6/get_started` becomes the default, we need to backport the
license fixes to that page. Is it possible? Or do we require using the 1.x
branch given this
connorgoggins commented on pull request #18738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18738#issuecomment-660340224
Instead of just testing redirects on the contribute page in the preview,
shouldn't we be testing redirects across all pages?
leezu commented on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660325168
As mentioned, I don't think 30 minutes is an issue here as this is a default
feature, will run in parallel to other pipelines which already take 60 minutes.
leezu edited a comment on issue #18740:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18740#issuecomment-660324478
The pytest workers are all in separate processes. I'm only aware of the
difference that `OMP_NUM_THREADS=$(expr $(nproc) / 4)` is exported before
running the
leezu commented on issue #18740:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18740#issuecomment-660324478
The pytest workers are all in separate processes. I'm only aware of the
difference that `OMP_NUM_THREADS=$(expr $(nproc) / 4)` is exported before
running the parallel
access2rohit edited a comment on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660324294
We can split up and parallelize the jobs to run on multiple workers as a
part of multiple test suites in CI. That will speed things up but will consume
more
access2rohit edited a comment on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660324294
We can split up and parallelize the jobs to run on multiple workers as a
part of multiple test suites in CI. That will speed things up but will consume
more
access2rohit commented on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660324294
We can split up and parallelize the jobs to run on multiple works as a part
of multiple test suites in CI. That will speed things up but will consume more
CI
leezu commented on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660323091
@access2rohit there's only one long-running test:
```
]
[2020-02-25T20:36:21.873Z] OK (SKIP=1)
[2020-02-25T20:36:21.873Z] + nosetests-3.4
DickJC123 commented on issue #18740:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18740#issuecomment-660322294
I had some success with marking this test with `@pytest.mark.serial` without
understanding the underlying issue, or why this action fixed it. Could someone
enlighten
access2rohit commented on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660322071
> Why does the run linked above only take 26m then?
I think last successful run should be considered. And if we do then :
waytrue17 commented on a change in pull request #18690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18690#discussion_r456657714
##
File path: src/operator/subgraph/static_shape_subgraph_property.cc
##
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
leezu commented on pull request #18690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18690#issuecomment-660321410
Backtrace of the issue below. I use the following patch to obtain the
backtrace
``` diff
modified src/c_api/c_api_ndarray.cc
@@ -394,7 +394,6 @@ int
leezu commented on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660319898
Why does the run linked above only take 26m then?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
leezu edited a comment on pull request #18690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18690#issuecomment-660317004
This isn't working yet. You can try the following slight extension of the
`test_dynamic_shape.py`:
``` diff
modified
leezu commented on pull request #18690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18690#issuecomment-660317004
This is broken. You can try the following slight extension of the
`test_dynamic_shape.py`:
``` diff
modified tests/python/unittest/test_dynamic_shape.py
access2rohit commented on issue #18745:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18745#issuecomment-660315952
@leezu simply running all tests within test_large_array.py takes more than
90mins. I don't think its practical to enable them on CI. It will simply
timeout on all
leezu commented on a change in pull request #18690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18690#discussion_r456648950
##
File path: src/operator/subgraph/static_shape_subgraph_property.cc
##
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
leezu commented on a change in pull request #18690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18690#discussion_r456645837
##
File path: src/operator/subgraph/static_shape_subgraph_property.cc
##
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
leezu closed issue #17810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17810
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
leezu commented on issue #17810:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17810#issuecomment-660298253
GraphExecutor was removed
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
szha commented on pull request #18197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18197#issuecomment-660296403
@D-Roberts @hzfan could you look into the issue that @ptrendx mentioned? If
it can't be fixed in a couple of hours let's revert the change first.
szha commented on pull request #18574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18574#issuecomment-660295550
Thanks, Serge. How is this tested at the moment?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
szha commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456629856
##
File path: python/mxnet/numpy/multiarray.py
##
@@ -40,8 +40,9 @@
get_oshape_of_gather_nd_op
from ..ndarray._internal
access2rohit commented on pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#issuecomment-660294002
> @sandeep-krishnamurthy I'm not asking about MKL as feature request. I'm
saying that the current build is broken and it needs fix.
Basically I will
szha commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456629049
##
File path: python/mxnet/numpy/multiarray.py
##
@@ -92,6 +93,16 @@
_NDARRAY_NO_ZERO_DIM_BOOL_ARRAY = -1
_NDARRAY_ZERO_DIM_BOOL_ARRAY_FALSE = 0
szha commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456628889
##
File path: tests/python/unittest/test_np_large_array.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+#
szha commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456629152
##
File path: python/mxnet/numpy/multiarray.py
##
@@ -92,6 +93,16 @@
_NDARRAY_NO_ZERO_DIM_BOOL_ARRAY = -1
_NDARRAY_ZERO_DIM_BOOL_ARRAY_FALSE = 0
szha commented on pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#issuecomment-660292641
@access2rohit will do. We still need to fix the CI for enabling large tensor
first.
This is an
access2rohit commented on pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#issuecomment-660292618
Overall functionality seems fine. Can you run all the tests in the file
`tests/python/unittest/test_np_large_array.py` using pytest and paste the
output in the
szha commented on pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#issuecomment-660292353
@sandeep-krishnamurthy I'm not asking about MKL as feature request. I'm
saying that the current build is broken and it needs fix.
access2rohit edited a comment on pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#issuecomment-660291731
@szha
Can we move the file: `tests/python/unittest/test_np_large_array.py` to
nightly folder instead? Keeping them in unittest will significantly
access2rohit commented on pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#issuecomment-660291731
@szha
Can we move the file: tests/python/unittest/test_np_large_array.py to
nightly folder instead? Keeping them in unittest will significantly slowdown
the
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456624909
##
File path: tests/python/unittest/test_np_large_array.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456620176
##
File path: python/mxnet/numpy/multiarray.py
##
@@ -92,6 +93,16 @@
_NDARRAY_NO_ZERO_DIM_BOOL_ARRAY = -1
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18490#issuecomment-660283994
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [centos-cpu]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Kh4L commented on pull request #18490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18490#issuecomment-660283973
@mxnet-bot run ci [centos-cpu]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
access2rohit commented on a change in pull request #18368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18368#discussion_r456618261
##
File path: python/mxnet/numpy/multiarray.py
##
@@ -92,6 +93,16 @@
_NDARRAY_NO_ZERO_DIM_BOOL_ARRAY = -1
Kh4L commented on pull request #18574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18574#issuecomment-66028
@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-gpu]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mxnet-bot commented on pull request #18574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18574#issuecomment-660282257
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu]
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
