mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340729397
@piiswrong OK, this went through. Please go ahead and merge it
This is
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340587235
@cjolivier01 My new unit tests should indeed fail if functions for DType =
double are not computed in double, but in float. Even though
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340552182
I am trying again.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340524830
Sorry, I am getting real confused with these different repos. I now have
nnvm at commit
8d79cfd0b42fbe9f6ad75886d495065d5500b9dd.
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340498334
Yeah weird, a colleague told me his PR went through. But this failed already
twice for me, with the same error. I try another force push.
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340428659
??? Are unit tests of master broken (not mine!) ???
test_viz.test_print_summary ... ERROR
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340254925
Are we back to square 1 (Jenkins failed)? Can you skip CI?
This is an
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-340162717
Yes, please merge it. I rebase to master. This triggers Jenkins again, but
please do not wait (there are no changes of mine).
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-339969347
Finally!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-339892674
BTW @cjolivier01 This PR just does not get built at all, since 6 days. Is it
better I push it again regularly, or wait until it finally
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-338802232
@piiswrong Jenkins just won't run for this one, I am giving up
This is
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-338503770
What is wrong with Jenkins?
This is an automated message from the Apache
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-338430529
Which functions in mshadow_op.h would be used in an LSTM? sigmoid, or relu?
We could easily change them back to the old code and compare
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-338430381
Due to the unary/binary math functions?
In principle, at least for the majority of all expressions, we should go
through the same
mseeger commented on issue #8361: Simplified unary/binary math operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8361#issuecomment-338238388
@piiswrong : This is #8323, plus further changes of mine.
This is an
15 matches
Mail list logo
