[GitHub] szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367820170 The rules are standards we set for ourselves, and we probably don't want people to think this is a community that's OK with bending the rules whenever

[GitHub] szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367820170 The rules are standards we set for ourselves, and we probably don't want people to think this is a community that's OK to bend the rules whenever it's

[GitHub] szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-22 Thread GitBox
szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367746320 Yeah, that would be the right approach. Semver doesn?t have to apply for 0.x, so cherry pick should be fine.

[GitHub] szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function

2018-02-21 Thread GitBox
szha commented on issue #9858: softsign activation function URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9858#issuecomment-367558481 Please cherry pick into release branch once #9851 is merged. This is an automated