[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-10-29 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-718966030 Hi, you can find the PR here: #878 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-25 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-698332246 Cool! I'm hoping I can merge the required change on NuttX side and then I can open a PR here so we can discuss the changes on nimBLE side.

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-24 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-698332246 Cool! I'm hoping I can merge the required change on NuttX side and then I can open a PR here so we can discuss the changes on nimBLE side.

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-21 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-696111317 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-21 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-696182614 I just tried that and it doesn't work. You cannot override include search paths for `#include` directives using `"` instead of `<`/`>`. If it were included as `#include ` you can

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-21 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-696159797 But `modlog.h` is also inside host/include and also uses `"` to include so I cannot override it. You can see the include path here: ``` In file included from

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-21 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-696111317 I understand. The problem is that `modlog.h` (another file under `porting/nimble/include`) does `#include "log/log.h"` so I cannot override it with include flags. `modlog.h` in

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-19 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-695363772 Mmm, actually I just commented this definitions out in `log.h` so I guess they are not needed. Is that correct?

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-19 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-695363265 Thanks for your response > `MYNEWY_VAL` macros are not defined because relevant syscfg settings are only defined when NimBLE Controller package is included in build. if you'd

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-19 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-695359710 > > However one issue I find is that NuttX requires an initial include in every .c and .h as: `#include ` which holds the output of the Kconfig configuration system. For the OS

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-16 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-693629093 I'm hitting an issue where some controller-related macros are not defined (not that I'm not using controller), even after adding them to syscfg.yml. For example, BLE_CONTROLLER,

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-16 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-693552683 > However one issue I find is that NuttX requires an initial include in every .c and .h as: `#include ` which holds the output of the Kconfig configuration system. For the OS

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-16 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-693549325 Ah, you're right. I see it there. Ok, I will continue then to build nimBLE from within NuttX using this syscfg.h.

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-16 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-693545708 Thanks, yes, I've found some email in mailing list archive with similar error and it was suggested to use newt from master. This problem disappeared then. However, I'm struggling

[GitHub] [mynewt-nimble] v01d commented on issue #864: Porting nimBLE to NuttX

2020-09-16 Thread GitBox
v01d commented on issue #864: URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/issues/864#issuecomment-693469399 I think I'm understanding that i need to generate a syscfg.h for my platform. I've found some information in other issues here on how to supposeddly do this. I've created a newt