jacobrosenthal opened a new issue #826: soft pwm api questions URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-core/issues/826 Current softpwm uses os cpu time, ie I think that means it shares with the system timer. At how often a timer would that get problematic? Would it be better to use a separate hal timer? or I guess maybe a syscfg flag to choose the source? Secondly, soft pwm appears to attempt to utilize the pwm api 1:1, why should it get a separate device name? https://github.com/apache/mynewt-core/blob/master/apps/pwm_test/src/main.c#L41 I would argue for the default bsps to resolve soft pwm to pwm0
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
