[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #1096: Updated Rx65n rtc for non CONFIG_RTC_HIRES

2020-05-28 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #1096: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1096#issuecomment-635639534 I pulled the changes, resolved the conflicts, and merged to master. I will now have to close this PR. Please verify that the changes are in place correctly.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #1096: Updated Rx65n rtc for non CONFIG_RTC_HIRES

2020-05-28 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #1096: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1096#issuecomment-635633538 I think I can merge this onto a branch, fix the conflicts, then merge it to main. That is not the preferred way of doing things, but might allow us to make some

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #1096: Updated Rx65n rtc for non CONFIG_RTC_HIRES

2020-05-27 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #1096: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1096#issuecomment-634609996 You probably have to force the push upstream. That should ignore that fact that the branches has divurged and simply overwrite the old branch with the new one.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #1096: Updated Rx65n rtc for non CONFIG_RTC_HIRES

2020-05-26 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #1096: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1096#issuecomment-633625863 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to