patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625252903
This is all very annoying to me. It is difficult to work in an environment
where people are making many, arbitrary changes that are not improvements that
but just
patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625250198
Please remove the controversional name changes from this PR and lets deal
with that separately. I definitely want to keep the name
sched_get_stackinfo(). I just wrote
patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625249087
> But there are many name already violative your rule:
> sched_getaffinity
> sched_getcpu
> sched_getparam
> sched_getscheduler
> sched_getstreams
>
patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625244585
But this is hard to have a real technical discussion because this is about
your ego, not about the engineering work.
patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625240973
Also I do not like the name clock_systimetick(). It feels like bad English
to me.
This is an
patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625237776
> Here is another example you need decide:
>
[4bb943a](https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/commit/4bb943a0c0ab173d7f5eb0178fd3a332726ce861)
Yes, that is
patacongo commented on pull request #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/969#issuecomment-625008732
> I am fine if you still think the clock_systimer is better than
clock_systimetick.
I don't have strong feelings about names as long as the following the naming
