jlaitine commented on PR #12049:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12049#issuecomment-2039593108
@xiaoxiang781216 I kept the generic armv8-a and armv8-r, but added them in
the end of the same if list; so if there is cpu flag, the generic arch flag is
not used. Would this look
jerpelea commented on PR #12062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12062#issuecomment-2039569630
12.5.0 is already released
I am trying to push 12.5.1-rc0 today for testing and vote
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
acassis commented on PR #111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-website/pull/111#issuecomment-2039567831
> please link the fix
https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2344
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12038
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
acassis commented on PR #12062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12062#issuecomment-2039566494
@jerpelea is this PR planed to enter in 12.5.1 or 12.5.0? I think it is
dangerous to release a version like 12.5.0 with bugs like this and like the one
found o blue-pill.
--
This is
acassis commented on PR #2312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2312#issuecomment-2039552809
> What about a script that pre-downloads the lvgl library? The main NuttX
Kconfig lvgl entry could say that running the script is advisable and to re-run
make menuconfig having done
jerpelea opened a new pull request, #12062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12062
## Summary
Prior to this commit, doswitch is returned uninitialized if (task_state ==
TSTATE_TASK_ASSIGNED || task_state == TSTATE_TASK_RUNNING) && no context switch
occurs
&& (cpu == me).
acassis commented on PR #2344:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2344#issuecomment-2039543674
> The commit message and PR description are a little confusing. Instead of
"Never disable HELP and ?" I recommend "Enable HELP and ? by default."
It is same as 0 and "Oh", I
acassis commented on PR #2344:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2344#issuecomment-2039537321
Done
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
jerpelea opened a new pull request, #12060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12060
## Summary
Update configs after modification
https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2344
## Impact
Users will be able to see the help about commands in the NSH
## Testing
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #2344:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2344#issuecomment-2039514491
@acassis please rebase your patch to pass ci.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
jerpelea commented on PR #111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-website/pull/111#issuecomment-2039468855
please link the fix
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jerpelea commented on PR #111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-website/pull/111#issuecomment-2039468449
we will do a 12.5.1 release with blue-pill fix
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #12059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12059
## Summary
This error was left in the original PR, I messed up with re-basing patches
accross branches. The duty cycle is a 16.16 fixed point integer (ub16) between
0-1.
## Impact
michallenc opened a new pull request, #12058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12058
## Summary
iC-JX expander has NINT (not an interrupt) pin that goes to logical zero if
interrupt occurs. This commit adds support for iC-JX options settings that
allows to enable the interrupt
jlaitine commented on PR #12054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12054#issuecomment-2039426945
Squashed all the fixes together, re-tested with logic analyzer
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
simbit18 closed issue #12057: Apr 05, 2024 : GitHub Status
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/12057
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
simbit18 opened a new issue, #12057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/12057
Update - We've reverted a change we believe caused this, are seeing initial
indications of reduced errors, and are monitoring for full recovery
Apr 05, 2024 - 09:00 UTC
jlaitine commented on PR #12054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12054#issuecomment-2039272429
I added one patch to this same PR, just found a bug that it was not possible
to re-start the PWM outputs if it had been stopped.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
jerpelea opened a new pull request, #111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-website/pull/111
## Summary
Add NuttX 12.5.0 release
## Impact
RELEASE
## Testing
NONE
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jerpelea pushed a change to annotated tag nuttx-12.5.0
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
*** WARNING: tag nuttx-12.5.0 was modified! ***
from 34f182c62a (commit)
to 87d404034a (tag)
tagging
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jerpelea pushed a change to annotated tag nuttx-12.5.0
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-apps.git
*** WARNING: tag nuttx-12.5.0 was modified! ***
from e2805fc9c (commit)
to 1d52a8d25 (tag)
Author: jerpelea
Date: Fri Apr 5 06:12:03 2024
New Revision: 68324
Log:
Add apache-nuttx-12.5.0 release
Added:
release/nuttx/12.5.0/
release/nuttx/12.5.0/apache-nuttx-12.5.0.tar.gz (with props)
release/nuttx/12.5.0/apache-nuttx-12.5.0.tar.gz.asc
ChenChuangForLinux commented on PR #12056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12056#issuecomment-2039013658
when the offest from rwb->wrblockstart to startblock plus rwb->wrnblocks is
greater than rwb->wralignblocks, it will be causing memory overflow since
rwb->wrbuffer is
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
